Skip to content

Florida · Public charity

Sightlife

We serve as a global leader and partner to eliminate corneal blindness.

$10k
Granted FY2022
1
Itemized grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
100%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$5k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$5,016
Largest grant, FY2022
$5,016
Organizations funded a year
1 to 8
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 100% of the organizations Sightlife funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthInternational
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20221$5k100%
FY20213$21k33%
FY20205$65k20%
FY20198$91k25%
FY20186$95k17%
FY20176$103kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$234kEducation$108kHuman Services$18kRecreation & Sports$14kInternational$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Washington State School for the Blind$89,0504n/a
Vision For Independence Center$75,540528%
Sight Connection$72,12543%
Spokane Central Lions Activities Foundation$51,950411%
Kindering Center$28,54030%
Northwest Association for Blind Athletes$13,80021%
Northwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children$11,70020%
Type 1 United$8,0001n/a
Lilac Services for the Blind$8,00011%
Northwest Association for Blind Athletes$7,9601n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Sightlife by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Washington State School for the Blind$89,0504n/a
Vision For Independence Center$75,540528%
Sight Connection$72,12543%
Spokane Central Lions Activities Foundation$51,950411%
Kindering Center$28,54030%
Northwest Association for Blind Athletes$13,80021%
Northwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children$11,70020%
Type 1 United$8,0001n/a
Lilac Services for the Blind$8,00011%
Northwest Association for Blind Athletes$7,9601n/a
Pacific University$7,50010%
Himalayan Cataract Project Inc$5,01610%

Where it is load-bearing

Sightlife supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVision For Independence Center: $75,540 over 5y, 28% of budgetSight Connection: $72,125 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSpokane Central Lions Activities Foundation: $51,950 over 4y, 11% of budgetKindering Center: $28,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Association for Blind Athletes: $13,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNorthwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children: $11,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLilac Services for the Blind: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPacific University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHimalayan Cataract Project Inc: $5,016 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sightlife with peer funders

About Sightlife

How much does Sightlife give?
Sightlife reported 1 itemized grants totaling $5,016, out of $9,588 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Sightlife fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Health (62%), Education (29%), Human Services (5%).
Who are Sightlife's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Washington State School for the Blind ($89k), Vision For Independence Center ($76k), Sight Connection ($72k).
Does Sightlife fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sightlife?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Sightlife based?
Sightlife is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sightlife’s filings →

More from the funding graph