Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shugar Magic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Public Benefit$580kEnvironment$558kCivil Rights$125kHuman Services$71kHealth$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kReligion$20kSocial Science$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$12,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER$200,000
AMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY$50,000
NATIONAL CAUCUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATORS$12,500
VOTE SOLAR$12,500
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW POLICY CENTER$10,000
EARTH JUSTICE$10,000
BEND THE ARC$7,500
UNITE TO LIGHT$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SHELTER TECH: $10k → 10%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER PROJECT OF THE TIDES CENTER: $11k → 7%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER PROJECT OF THE TIDES CENTER: $350 → 7%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER PROJECT OF THE TIDES CENTER: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
CA
UT
CO
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$530k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
38

Total granted

$1.1M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+26%

Still filing today

82%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsInternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    Vote Solar
    4× · 2019–2024 · $65k · revenue +41%
  • AC
    Atma Connect
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +103%
  • Rocky Mountain Institute
    2× · 2021–2023 · $33k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • BV
    BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND INC DBA BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • NV
    NEW VENTURE FUND DBA VOTER ENGAGEMENT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • WS
    WIND SOLAR ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
5
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
6
Breakthrough Energy Foundation

Working with our world-class network of innovators, business and industry leaders, and policy experts, we accelerate the innovation of climate technologies at every stage - from discovery to development to deployment.

Public Benefit
7
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
8
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
9
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
10
Solar Energy Industries Association

Seia is the driving force behind solar energy and storage, building a stronger solar industry to power america through advocacy and education. representing organizations that promote, manufacture, install and support the development of…

—
11
The Alliance for Just Deliberation On Solar Geoengineering Inc

The alliance for just deliberation on solar geoengineering (dsg) is a charitable, scientific and educational organization dedicated to building just and inclusive deliberation about research and potential use of solar geoengineering. solar…

Environment
12
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is As You Sow and the most unlike its peers is Epic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Developmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,523

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SIERRA CLUB — $67,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUBBLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND INC DBA BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE — $60,000 · OtherBLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND INC DBA BVM CAPAC…NEW VENTURE FUND DBA VOTER ENGAGEMENT FUND — $60,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND DBA VOTER ENGAGEMENT FUNDBEND THE ARC — $59,500 · OtherBEND THE ARCWIND SOLAR ALLIANCE — $50,000 · OtherWIND SOLAR ALLIANCERocky Mountain Institute — $33,000 · OtherRocky Mountain InstituteIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LAW POLICY CENTER — $30,000 · OtherAS YOU SOW — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherPOWER SHIFT NETWORK — $20,000 · OtherPENINSULA TEMPLE SHOLOM — $19,722 · Other+20 more — $115,650 · Other+20 moreTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $450,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTERNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATIONACCELERATE CHANGE INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsACCELERATE CHANGE INCVote Solar — $65,000 · EnvironmentVote SolarAMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC — $60,200 · EnvironmentAMERICAN SOLAR ENER…EARTHJUSTICE — $30,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $25,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW A…BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC — $18,500 · EnvironmentBETTER FUTURE PROJE…YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $18,500 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE TO YUKO…Epic Institute — $10,000 · EnvironmentHonnold Foundation — $10,000 · EnvironmentGridLab Inc — $10,000 · EnvironmentCalifornia Clean Energy Fund — $9,250 · Environment+3 more — $17,500 · Environment+3 moreAtma Connect — $40,000 · InternationalCYCLE CONNECT INC — $12,500 · InternationalUNITE TO LIGHT INC — $7,500 · InternationalCENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC — $25,000 · HealthSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $10,500 · HealthNATIONAL CAUCUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATORS — $17,900 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $1,000 · EducationPacifica Resource Center — $11,100 · Human ServicesShelter Tech — $10,000 · Human ServicesCONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY INC — $9,000 · PhilanthropySHANE MCCONKEY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$589,872Civil Rights$575,000Environment$273,950International$60,000Health$35,500Education$22,900Human Services$21,100Philanthropy$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $450,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $67,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVote Solar — $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC — $60,200 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetWIND SOLAR ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetAtma Connect — $40,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $33,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAS YOU SOW — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER SHIFT NETWORK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC — $18,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $18,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CAUCUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATORS — $17,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCYCLE CONNECT INC — $12,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPacifica Resource Center — $11,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEpic Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHonnold Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetShelter Tech — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGridLab Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SOLAR FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCalifornia Clean Energy Fund — $9,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WHITE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ST MARY'S IN THE MOUNTAINS — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITE TO LIGHT INC — $7,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetRENEWABLES 100 POLICY INSTITUTE — $7,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetMAMONI VALLEY PRESERVE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINTERSTATE RENEWABLE ENERGY COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARCTIC ICE PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Equal Justice Association Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHANE MCCONKEY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFICANS CARE — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Energy FoundationThe McKnight Foundati…United States Energy …Wallace Global Fund IISilicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincGordon E and Betty I …PatagoniaorgThe William & Flora H…Jewish Community Fede…The Overbrook Foundat…The Goldman Sachs Cha…
The Energy FoundationCA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Energy Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Overbrook Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shugar Magic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shugar Magic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shugar Magic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines