Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$26kPhilanthropy$22kHealth$10kArts & Culture$10kFood & Nutrition$6kReligion$5kCommunity Improvement$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVIDSON COLLEGE$4,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS$4,000
MOUNTAIN STATE SPOTLIGHT INC$1,000
DAVIS-STUART INC$1,000
GARY BOWLING HOUSE OF ART$1,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$1,000
BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION$1,000
BLUEFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL$500
NEW YORK TIMES NEEDIEST CASES FUND$500
BRAVER ANGELS$500
CRAFT MEMORIAL LIBRARY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BRAVER ANGELS: $500 → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $500 → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in WV; read by stated purpose it is 59% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69k · 11 repeat orgs$400 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$69k
$400

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +52%
  • BU
    BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • MS
    Mountain State Spotlight Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SC
    SONAMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $400

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Focus Inc

New york focus is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom covering state and local politics in the empire state.(continued on scheduleo)launched in october of 2020, new york focus aims to help make government more transparent by publishing…

Education
2
Central New York Community Foundation Inc

Our mission is to foster a thriving and equitable central new york region by leading and inspiring a community culture of giving, celebrating legacy and stewarding charitable resources for today and tomorrow.

Philanthropy
3
New Public Inc

The organization's mission is to ensure that every community has a healthy digital public space by helping local communities across america create more flourishing digital spaces and developing prototypes for digital conversation with…

Science & Tech
4
Citizens United Foundation

An educational organization, which conducts research, informs and educates the public on various national and international issues.

Unclassified
5
Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc

Redwood credit union community fund, inc. will help to make a meaningful impact in advancing the well-being of our communities. our approach is to be respectful and intentional in our giving. we exist to meet the needs of others.

Philanthropy
6
St David's Foundation Community Fund

The mission of st. david's foundation community fund ("community fund") is to improve the health of central texans and to provide scholarships to financially disadvantaged students pursuing a health care career at a texas college or…

Health
7
The Community Foundation of Dickinson County Inc

To connect donors with their charitable giving priorities, serve as a resource for local nonprofit organizations and provide leadership to the community.

Philanthropy
8
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
9
North Star Alliance

To address environmental, social justice, and personal development issues through experiential education, media campaigns, training programs, and program-related investments.

Environment
10
Nonprofit Finance Fund

Nonprofit finance fund is a nonprofit lender, consultant, and advocate. for 45 years, we've helped organizations access the money and resources they need to realize their communities' aspirations. alongside others, we're working to build…

Community Improvement
11
National Taxpayers Union Foundation

National taxpayers union foundation (ntuf) provides crucial, impactful research and analysis showing americans how taxes, government spending, and regulations affect them. with our unique combination of policy expertise, outreach know-how,…

12
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Star Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gary Bowlings House of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Davidson College — $22,600 · EducationDavidson CollegeCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC — $11,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TH…THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND — $7,800 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNI…BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC — $4,500 · OtherBLUEFIELD UNION MIS…CRAFT MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $3,500 · OtherCRAFT MEMORIAL LIBR…BLUEFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL — $3,500 · OtherBLUEFIELD PRIMARY S…NORTH STAR FUND INC — $2,600 · OtherNORTH STAR FUND INC+1 more — $400 · OtherDAVIS-STUART INC — $10,300 · HealthDAVIS-STUART I…Mountain State Spotlight Inc — $4,000 · Arts & CultureGARY BOWLINGS HOUSE OF ART INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $6,000 · Food & NutritionFORT GREENE STRATEGIC NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,600 · Community ImprovementBraver AngelsInc — $1,500 · Human Services
Education$22,600Philanthropy$19,300Other$14,500Health$10,300Arts & Culture$6,500Food & Nutrition$6,000Community Improvement$2,600Human Services$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDavidson College — $22,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC — $11,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC — $10,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND — $7,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMountain State Spotlight Inc — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC — $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT GREENE STRATEGIC NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGARY BOWLINGS HOUSE OF ART INC — $2,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetBraver AngelsInc — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Davidson College
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC
  • Who funds DAVIS-STUART INC
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC
  • Who funds Mountain State Spotlight Inc
  • Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC
  • Who funds FORT GREENE STRATEGIC NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds GARY BOWLINGS HOUSE OF ART INC
  • Who funds Braver AngelsInc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Shott-Baker Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph