Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shokooh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Community Improvement$182kInternational$181kHealth$134kHuman Services$110kFood & Nutrition$50kEducation$24kCrime & Legal$15kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$42,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOMS AGAINST POVERTY$100,000
CHILD$100,000
PROJECT SUNSHINE$42,000
NETWORK OF IRANIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONALS OF ORANGE COUNTY$31,500
LA CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $100k → 7%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $50k → 14%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $60k → 7%YARAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 4 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$536k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    Network of Iranian-American Professionals of Orange County
    5× · 2018–2024 · $182k · revenue +425% · 100% of their budget
  • MA
    MOMS AGAINST POVERTY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue -4%
  • C
    CHILD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $110k

Funded once

  • MS
    MERCY SHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
Planetary Science Institute

The Planetary Science Institute studies the origin, characteristics, and evolution of planetary systems, including our solar system, Earth itself, and planetary systems around other stars. We convey the resulting knowledge to the…

—
3
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
4
Yamba Malawi Inc

Yamba malawi transforms children's lives by empowering communities to break the cycle of poverty. with community-led programs centered around childhood wellbeing, sustainable businesses, and financial management our childhoods &…

Human Services
5
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
6
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
7
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
8
GIVE2ASIA

Give2asia provides philanthropic services to individuals, foundations, corporations and charitable organizations in the united states and asia. give2asia matches donor interests and grantee mission and capacity to make international…

International
9
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
10
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
11
Global Alliance for Children

Promoting and supporting the development of national and community level systems that help children realize their full potential within a nurturing, protective family care environment.

—
12
Pyxera Global Inc

To reinvent how public, private and social interests converge to address global challenges.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moms Against Poverty; the most unlike its peers is Network of Iranian-American Professionals of Orange County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $160,000 · Human ServicesMOMS AGAINST POVERTYFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM I…YARAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNetwork of Iranian-American Professionals of Orange County: $181,500 · EducationNetwork of Iranian-American Prof…LSU FOUNDATION: $23,600 · EducationLSU FOUNDATIONCHILD: $110,000 · OtherCHILDMERCY SHIP: $50,000 · OtherMERCY SHIPLA CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $15,000 · OtherLA CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICEIASF: $10,000 · OtherIASF+1 more: $1,000 · OtherPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $84,000 · HealthPROJECT SUNSH…KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Science Center: $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$220,000Education$205,100Other$186,000Health$84,000Youth Development$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNetwork of Iranian-American Professionals of Orange County: $181,500 over 5y, 100% of budgetMOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $160,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $84,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $23,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYARAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetYouth Science Center: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shokooh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shokooh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shokooh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shokooh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shokooh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph