Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shirley & David B Sykes Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Civil Rights$86kArts & Culture$79kEducation$55kFood & Nutrition$28kPhilanthropy$10kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRODUCTIVE J$20,000
FREINDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES$7,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 5 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$151k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+12%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRO JUSTICE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k
  • BE
    BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $41k · revenue +85%
  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $32k

Funded once

  • CC
    Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -36%
  • CL
    CIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
2
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

—
3
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
5
Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy)

Amda is committed to providing an unsurpassed performing arts education to a diverse community of creative artists. amda seeks to be both the school and the stage, where students are given the support and the freedom to find their voice…

—
6
Theater Mu Incorporated

Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.

Arts & Culture
7
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
8
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
9
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
10
Kitchen Theatre Company Inc

In its intimate performance space, the Kitchen Theatre Company (KTC) creates professional theatre that challenges the intellect, excites the imagination, informs and entertains. KTC nurtures a community of diverse artists and brings…

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago Shakespeare Theater

To create vivid, entertaining theatrical experiences that invigorate and engage people of all ages and identities by illuminating the complexity, ambiguity, and wonder of our world. shared humanity and unforgettable stories - now this is…

Arts & Culture
12
Alley Theatre

To inspire and enchant lives through a variety of theatrical experiences at the highest level of artistic excellence with our Resident Acting Company at the center

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Ensemble Theater Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Khecari. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRO JUSTICE: $45,000 · OtherCOLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRO JUSTICERINGLING COLLEGE: $32,000 · OtherRINGLING COLLEGECOLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRODUCTIVE J: $20,000 · OtherCOLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRODUCTIVE JCIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICY: $20,000 · OtherCIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICYBOB DYLAN CNTERAMER SONG ARCHIVES: $10,000 · OtherBOB DYLAN CNTERAMER SONG ARCHIVES+4 more: $5,000 · OtherBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $40,999 · Arts & CultureBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPOR…Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center: $20,000 · Arts & CultureChicago City Theatre Company …FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCH…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHI…ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS …Feeding America: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ame…HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $23,000 · EducationHAMPSHIRE…TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$132,000Arts & Culture$69,499Food & Nutrition$27,500Education$23,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $40,999 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKhecari: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shirley & David B Sykes Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shirley & David B Sykes Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shirley & David B Sykes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph