Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shilen & Parita Patel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$107kCommunity Improvement$45kArts & Culture$37kReligion$18kHuman Services$14kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL$36,908
TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART$11,500
TIE TAMPA BAY$10,000
GUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA$5,000
KERRY MURPHY HEALY CENTER$5,000
TAMPA BAY FASHION FOUNDATION$5,000
GLAZER CHILDRENS MUSEUM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEELS TO HEAL: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 4 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$153k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k
  • TT
    TIE TAMPABAY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +16%
  • GS
    GUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA BAY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TAMPA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +44%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CP
    CORBETT PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

To support the greater tampa chamber of commerce through leadership and educational programs.

Education
2
St Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce

The st petersburg area chamber of commerce shall be the preeminent leader of business in order to ensure the economic growth and vitality for all in our community.

—
3
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts Inc

The florida museum of photographic arts is a museum dedicated to exhibiting important photographic art as central to contemporary life and culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Florida Tourism Industry Marketing Corp Inc

To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.

—
5
Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce Inc

To serve our members and enhance our community by building business success.

—
6
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
7
The John & Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation Incorporated

The ringling is a place of art, architecture, and circus in an environment that inspires, educates, entertains, and honors the legacy of john & mable ringling.

Arts & Culture
8
University of Miami
—
9
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
10
Tampa Bay Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To market and promote the Hillsborough County destination to tourists nationally and internationally.

—
11
Tampa Women Stars Inc
Community Improvement
12
The University of Tampa Incorporated

The University of Tampa is a comprehensive, independent University that delivers challenging and high-quality educational experiences to a diverse group of learners. (Continued in Schedule O).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Tampa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heels to Heal Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $95,408 · OtherBERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCGUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA BAY INC: $13,000 · OtherGUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA BAY INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,120 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKERRY MURPHY HEALY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherKERRY MURPHY HEALY CENTERCORBETT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $7,250 · OtherMIND BODY & SOUL HEALTH MINISTRY INC: $7,000 · Other+3 more: $13,900 · Other+3 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TAMPA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM…TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureTAMPA MUSEUM OF A…WORLD CONSCIOUSNESS ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD CONSCIOUSNE…TIE TAMPABAY INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitTIE TAMPABAY INCBABSON COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $782 · EducationHEELS TO HEAL INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$156,678Arts & Culture$36,500Public Benefit$35,000Education$5,782Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIE TAMPABAY INC: $35,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TAMPA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA BAY INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CONSCIOUSNESS ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetHEELS TO HEAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIE TAMPABAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TAMPA INC ↗
  • Who funds GUJARATI SAMAJ OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CONSCIOUSNESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEELS TO HEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shilen & Parita Patel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shilen & Parita Patel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Tampa Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shilen & Parita Patel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph