Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
To provide money to various local charities.
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2020.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote sheboygan county business development.
Local community charitable projects
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
The mission of the sheboygan county economic development corporation foundation, a countywide private/public partnership, is to lead diversified economic & community development efforts in order to improve the long term prosperity of the…
A spiritually based organization of faith communities to educate and advocate for social justice, dignity, and to improve quality of life for all people by being a bridge between community needs and partner resources.
Operating/maintaining a public museum and providing educational programs related to the history of sheboygan county, wisconsin.
Our mission is to provide efficient, progressive financial services and products to our owner-members in agreement with credit union philosophy
Sheboygan county head start/early head start is a federal & state funded preschool and family development program for families who are at or below the federal poverty guidelines. growing generations childcare center provides enhanced child…
To produce and perform community theatre through local actors and volunteers for all of sheboygan.
To enrich our community's cultural environment and the artistic lives of our musicians through public performances and educational programs.
To promote the city to draw businesses.
To empower those impacted by domestic and sexual violence through compassionate support and comprehensive services, while fostering a community rooted in safety, equity, and healthy relationships. we strive to prevent future violence…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is John Michael Kohler Arts Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Sheboygan County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Sartori Family Foundation Inc · Randall J & Judith F Hake · Wm Collins Kohler Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation SHEBOYGAN SERVICE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN SHEBOYGAN COUNTY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~24 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 391018013 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN SHEBOYGAN COUNTY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Sheboygan Service Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.