Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sheana R Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$540k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$811kEducation$150kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$10kHousing & Shelter$10kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $400k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$200,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$150,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$50,000
UCSF - ROMBAUER PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH$40,000
OPERATION SMILE INC$20,000
BIG SKY HOSPICE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$10,000
SOS CHRISTIAN MUSIC RADIO$10,000
BITTER ROOT LAND TRUST$10,000
BITTERROOT WATER PARTNERSHIP$10,000
CORVALLIS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
SAFE HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG SKY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%BITTERROOT WATER PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $150k → 12%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%CORVALLIS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200k → 17%THE V FOUNDATION: $75k → 8%OPERATION SMILE INC: $20k → 10%SOS CHRISTIAN MUSIC RADIO: $10k → 13%BITTER ROOT LAND TRUST: $10k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $150k → 12%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%CORVALLIS FFA ALUMNI: $10k → 18%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150k → 17%OPERATION SMILE INC: $6k → 10%SAFE HOUSE: $10k → 11%SUPPORTERS OF ABUSE FREE ENVIRONMENTS INC: $10k → 11%BITTER ROOT LAND TRUST: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
OR
NV
CA
VA
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 5 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$836k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthEnvironmentEducationInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $350k · revenue +10%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $300k · revenue 0%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $140k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +140%
  • SO
    SUPPORTERS OF ABUSE FREE ENVIRONMENTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
10
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
11
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Supporters of Abuse Free Environments Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $300,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENTHE V FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER …UCSF - ROMBAUER PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH: $40,000 · OtherUCSF - ROM…CORVALLIS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCORVALLIS …SOS CHRISTIAN MUSIC RADIO: $10,000 · OtherSOS CHRIST…SAFE HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherSAFE HOUSESUPPORTERS OF ABUSE FREE ENVIRONMENTS INC: $10,000 · OtherSUPPORTERS…BIG SKY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherBIG SKY HO…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual…BITTER ROOT LAND TRUST: $20,000 · EnvironmentBITTERROOT WATER PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · EnvironmentOPERATION SMILE INC: $25,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$735,000Education$140,000Other$100,000Environment$30,000International$25,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBITTER ROOT LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORTERS OF ABUSE FREE ENVIRONMENTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sheana R Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sheana R Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sheana R’s filings →

More from the funding graph