Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shaughnessy Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$588kEducation$580kReligion$407kHuman Services$400kHealth$113kHousing & Shelter$103kPhilanthropy$66kFood & Nutrition$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LABOURE CENTER$75,000
RCAB CLERGY BENEFIT FUNDING TRUST$50,000
SOUTH BOSTON CATHOLIC ACADEMY$50,000
RON BURTON TRAINING VILLAGE$22,000
BOSTON COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FUND$20,000
ALMA CARES INC$15,000
MY BROTHER'S KEEPER$10,000
RODMAN FOR KIDS$10,000
THE IRELAND FUNDS FBO MANOOTH UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS$10,000
ARCHBISHOP WILLIAMS HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF BOSTON$5,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC$5,000
POPE ST JOHN XXIII NATIONAL SEMINARY$5,000
FATHER BILL'S AND MAINSPRING$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $10k → 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $10k → 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $10k → 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $8k → 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $5k → 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $5k → 11%THE GREG HILL FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: $5k → 11%THE GREG HILL FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%TOMMYS PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 7%THE GREG HILL FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%TOMMYS PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 7%WINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $8k → 16%WINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $3k → 16%WINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $3k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $25k → 16%st francis house: $1k → 16%wellspring inc: $5k → 8%WELLSPRING INC: $3k → 8%JULIE'S FAMILY LEARNING PROGRAM INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 40 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
34

Total granted

$2.3M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+25%

Still filing today

43%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RB
    Ron Burton Training Village Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $314k · revenue +447%
  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +113%
  • FB
    FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $58k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO BE NAMED LATER
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • SY
    SQUANTUM YACHT CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
The Mccourt Foundation Inc

Striving to help cure neurological diseases, while empowering communities to build a healthier world.

Philanthropy
3
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
4
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Ocean State Cancer Crushers
—
6
Boston Bruins Charitable Foundation Inc

To assist charitable organizations that demonstrate a commitment to enhancing the quality of life for children and their families throughout new england. the foundation focuses on organizations that are concentrated on academics,…

Philanthropy
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
Sciboston Inc

To reach, inspire, support & empower individuals with spinal cord injuries

Human Services
9
Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives Inc

Massachusetts biomedical initiatives, inc. ("mbi or the organization") is a private non-profit corporation focusing on building up central massachusetts as a global biomanufacturing hub. our mission of being a partner for fostering…

Science & Tech
10
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
11
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
12
Bernice & Philip Frieze Fund Inc

The mission of the fund is to raise money through an annual charity golf tournament with all proceeds received being donated to children's hospital corporation d/b/a boston children's hospital (or other affiliated or non-affiliated…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
25/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ron Burton Training Village Inc: $314,000 · OtherRon Burton Training Village IncTHE LABOURE CENTER: $277,500 · OtherTHE LABOURE CENTERSOUTH BOSTON CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $200,000 · OtherSOUTH BOSTON CATHOLIC ACADEMYBOSTON COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $175,000 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOLARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON: $120,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTONARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON CLERGY BENEFIT FUNDING TRUST: $100,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON CLERGY BENEFIT FUNDING TRUST+51 more: $643,728 · Other+51 moreRodman For Kids Inc: $236,000 · PhilanthropyRodman For…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $52,500 · Human ServicesGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesWINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $12,500 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Education+2 more: $5,000 · EducationTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $76,000 · HealthNoelles Light Inc: $5,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $7,250 · HealthFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC: $57,500 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH SHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterALMA CARES INC: $52,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,830,228Philanthropy$241,000Human Services$133,500Education$105,000Health$98,250Housing & Shelter$67,500Public Benefit$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc: $314,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetRodman For Kids Inc: $236,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $76,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC: $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $52,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALMA CARES INC: $52,500 over 6y, 30% of budgetFALMOUTH ROAD RACE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSQUANTUM YACHT CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOSTON WINTER BALL CORPORATION: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $12,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FUND OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH SHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNoelles Light Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETHANY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAVIN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BOSTON COLLABORATIVE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJulies Family Learning Program Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARACLETE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOSTON CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHINGHAM SPORTS PARTNERSHIP: $2,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetALS ONE INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rodman For Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALMA CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH ROAD RACE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREG HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUANTUM YACHT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOSTON WINTER BALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FUND OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arbella Insurance FoundationMA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · South Shore Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Wolf & Company Charitable Foundation Inc · Suffolk Cares Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shaughnessy Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shaughnessy Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • South Boston Collaborative Center Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Gavin Foundation Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Crossroads for Kids Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wellspring Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Als One Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaughnessy’s filings →

More from the funding graph