Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Shasta College Foundation

Support shasta college by building strong partnerships, generating friendships and financial support, and promoting excellence in education and service to the community.

$473k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $201,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $472,592 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $271,592 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISKIYOU JOINT CCD$45,000
GLENN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCAT$15,000
REACH HIGHER SHASTA$15,000
LASSEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST$15,000
HEALTHY RURAL CALIFORNIA INC$15,000
THE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAI$15,000
SIERRA PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED S$10,000
SISKIYOU JOINT CCD FOUNDATION$10,000
PLUMAS COUNTY SCHOOL$10,000
EXPECT MORE TEHAMA$10,000
TRAINING EMPLOYMENT & COMMUNI$10,000
CHICO STATE ENTERPRISE$10,000
COLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS$7,000
FCCC$7,000
CALIFORNIA COMPETES$7,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRAINING EMPLOYMENT & COMMUNI: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
2
California State Student Association

CSSA as a student-led organization strives to improve the lives of California State University (CSU) students by advocating for student needs and engaging students in systemwide, state, and federal higher education policy making.

Education
3
Faculty Association of California Community Colleges Education Institute

The association was formed to do research and analyses and the dissemination of information to and the ongoing education and professional development of california community college faculty.

Education
4
Building and Protecting Californias Future

Part III, Q1 To Further awareness of jobs, education and training.

5
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
6
Student Senate for California Community Colleges

To pursue policies that will improve student access, promote student success, engage and empower local student leaders, and enrich the collegiate experience for all of the california community college students.

Education
7
California Community Colleges Classified Senate

To serve as the statewide senate for claifornia community colleges. 4cs supports the leadership roles of classified staff in the governance of the california community college system through the development and support of local senates,…

Education
8
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

9
The California-Mexico Studies Cente

The California-Mexico Studies Centers mission is to establish programs between higher education institutions and cultural organizations that will enhance the teaching and exchange of faculty and students between California and Mexico and…

Education
10
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

11
The California Education Partners

California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…

Education
12
The University Foundation California State University Chico

To build a culture of philanthropy by harnessing the expertise and passion of our alumni, parents, and friends to raise private support for the education, practical research, and public service that transforms the lives of our students,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for California Community Colleges and the most unlike its peers is Training Employment & Community Help Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS FOUNDATION — $55,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS FOUNDATIONGLENN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCAT — $15,000 · OtherGLENN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATLASSEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $15,000 · OtherLASSEN COMMUNITY COLLEGEREACH HIGHER SHASTA — $15,000 · OtherREACH HIGHER SHASTASIERRA PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED S — $10,000 · OtherSIERRA PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SFEATHER RIVER CCD — $10,000 · OtherFEATHER RIVER CCDCOLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS — $7,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUSTHE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAINING CENTER — $15,000 · EducationTHE WATERSHED RESEARC…Chico State Enterprises — $10,000 · EducationChico State Enterpris…FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $7,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CALIFO…CALIFORNIA COMPETES — $7,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA COMPETESHEALTHY RURAL CALIFORNIA INC — $15,000 · HealthTraining Employment & Community Help Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesEXPECT MORE TEHAMA — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$127,000Education$39,000Health$15,000Human Services$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAINING CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTraining Employment & Community Help Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChico State Enterprises — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMPETES — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for California Community CollegesCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for California Community Colleges · The McConnell Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shasta College Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shasta College Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shasta College Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph