Skip to content
Sharon & Crescent United Credit Union at a glance

· Public charity

Sharon & Crescent United Credit Union

Our mission is to provide a full range of financial services to the members in our community at competitive rates while emphasizing financial soundness, convenience and efficient-friendly service, while maintaining a challenging, rewarding and enriching environment for all employees.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Youth Development$216kHealth$13kInternational$10kPublic Benefit$8kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $80,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $128,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$50,000
RODMAN FOR KIDS$10,000
SHARON COMMUNITY TELEVISION$7,000
SHARON FOOD PANTRY$6,500
YMCA - BROCKTON$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MY BROTHERS KEEPER: $5k → 11%YMCA - BROCKTON: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$284k · 3 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$284k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +5%
  • RF
    Rodman For Kids Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue -14%
  • SH
    Signature Healthcare Corporation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue -42%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • TO
    TOWN OF EASTON
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SH
    SHARON HIGH BOOSTERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
2
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
4
Boston Center for Biblical Counseling
Philanthropy
5
Brockton Hospital Inc

Signature healthcare brockton hospital is a community-based not-for-profit teaching hospital serving more than 460,000 residents in more than 20 southeastern massachusetts communities. the hospital has 216 licensed beds and provides a full…

Health
6
Signature Healthcare Medical Group Inc

To support the medical, educational, scientific and charitable purpose of brockton hospital by improving access to medical care provided by the hospital.

Health
7
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
8
Brookline Community Mental Health Center Inc Dba the Brookline Center

The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…

—
9
Wendell P Clark Memorial Ymca Inc

To build a sense of community by developing character and positive values through activities that promote social, physical and emotional well-being for all men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, and religions. the…

Youth Development
10
Brattleboro Community Television Inc

Brattleboro Community Television, Inc. (BCTV) is a community media center serving eight towns in southern Windham County, Vermont. OUR MISSION - To promote civic engagement and transparency, and to empower community members to share their…

Arts & Culture
11
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Signature Healthcare Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $250,150 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICASignature Healthcare Corporation: $12,500 · OtherSignature Hea…TOWN OF EASTON: $7,500 · OtherTOWN OF EASTO…SHARON COMMUNITY TELEVISION: $7,000 · OtherSHARON COMMUN…FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF SHARON: $6,500 · OtherFIRST CONGREG…SHARON HIGH BOOSTERS INC: $5,093 · OtherSHARON HIGH B…Rodman For Kids Inc: $21,000 · PhilanthropyOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $5,000 · Education
Youth Development$250,150Other$38,593Philanthropy$21,000Human Services$11,500Religion$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $250,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRodman For Kids Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSignature Healthcare Corporation: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARON COMMUNITY TELEVISION: $7,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sharon & Crescent United Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sharon & Crescent United Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Coaching for Change Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sharon & Crescent United Credit Union’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home