Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sharing the Power Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$338kEnvironment$70kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$8kYouth Development$5kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$10,000
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO$10,000
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$10,000
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY$10,000
SPELMAN COLLEGE$10,000
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY$10,000
PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND-COLLEGE PARK$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADSION$10,000
NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HISPANIC ACCESS FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IN
PA
KY
WV
VA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedict College

Benedict college is committed to providing transformative learning experiences characterized by high quality academic, co-curricular and extra-curricular programming, intentionally designed to develop superior cultural and professional…

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spelman College; the most unlike its peers is Coalfield Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL UNIVERSITYBULLARD CENTER FOR ENIVORNMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICE: $25,000 · OtherBULLARD CENTER FOR ENIVORNMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICEUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND-COLLEGE PARK: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND-COLLEGE PARKTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY+27 more: $210,500 · Other+27 moreTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITYTuskegee University: $10,000 · EducationTuskegee UniversityMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGEClark Atlanta University Inc: $10,000 · EducationClark Atlanta Universi…Spelman College: $10,000 · EducationSpelman CollegeCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterVIRGINIA INTERFAITH POWER & LIGHT: $7,500 · EnvironmentPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $5,000 · EnvironmentHispanic Access Foundation: $7,500 · Human ServicesDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$305,500Education$90,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Environment$12,500Human Services$7,500Youth Development$5,000Community Improvement$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTuskegee University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA INTERFAITH POWER & LIGHT: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHispanic Access Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Spelman College ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA INTERFAITH POWER & LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds Hispanic Access Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sharing the Power Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sharing the Power Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sharing the Power Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sharing the Power Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sharing the Power’s filings →

    More from the funding graph