Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$115k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’22
5
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$344kReligion$74kInternational$66kEducation$37kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$115,000
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CRO$25,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$25,000
PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$7,500
INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS$5,000
BNAI JESHURUN$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$5,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$5,000
THE NEW ISRAEL FUND$3,000
SO CA EDUCATION FUND$3,000
HILLEL AT STANFORD$2,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$2,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL$2,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,000
SAR ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $2k → 8%SO CA EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $150k → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $1k → 28%YALE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $2k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $5k → 10%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $1k → 8%SO CA EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $115k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $1k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 10%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $75k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $1k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 10%PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $8k → 17%CHABAD OF HARLEM: $13k → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $14k → 17%PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $3k → 17%CHABAD OF HARLEM: $3k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $5k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $3k → 17%JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $2k → 17%JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $5k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $3k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$190k
$0

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Teach for America Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +19%
  • CK
    CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +181%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    05the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $340,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+1 more: $3,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CRO: $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CR…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY: $14,750 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMYPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $10,000 · OtherPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIE…CONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN: $9,500 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN+4 more: $13,750 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,000 · InternationalTeach for America Inc: $10,000 · EducationCORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
    Philanthropy$343,500Other$164,000International$16,000Education$12,000Crime & Legal$10,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $340,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
    • Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
    • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
    • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
    • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
    • Who funds CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund?

      Find your warmest path to Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash’s filings →

      More from the funding graph