Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$115k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
22
5
23
5
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Philanthropy$344kReligion$74kInternational$66kEducation$37kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$115,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$25,000
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CRO$25,000
PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$7,500
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$5,000
BNAI JESHURUN$5,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$5,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS$5,000
SO CA EDUCATION FUND$3,000
THE NEW ISRAEL FUND$3,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$2,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL$2,000
HILLEL AT STANFORD$2,000
SAR ACADEMY$1,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $2k → 8%SO CA EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $150k → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $1k → 28%YALE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $2k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $5k → 10%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $1k → 8%SO CA EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $115k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $1k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 10%HILLEL AT STANFORD: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $75k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL NEW ORL: $1k → 15%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 10%PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $8k → 17%CHABAD OF HARLEM: $13k → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $14k → 17%PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $3k → 17%CHABAD OF HARLEM: $3k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $5k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $3k → 17%JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25k → 17%BNAI JESHURUN: $2k → 17%JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $5k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $3k → 17%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$190k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$190k
$0

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Teach for America Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +19%
  • CK
    CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +181%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    05the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $340,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+1 more — $3,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CRO — $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RED CR…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL — $50,000 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELIndividual grant recipient — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY — $14,750 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMYPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES — $10,000 · OtherPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIE…CONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN — $9,500 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN+4 more — $13,750 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $10,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND — $6,000 · InternationalTeach for America Inc — $10,000 · EducationCORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
    Philanthropy$343,500Other$164,000International$16,000Education$12,000Crime & Legal$10,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $340,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND
    • Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS
    • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
    • Who funds Teach for America Inc
    • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
    • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    • Who funds CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund?

      Find your warmest path to Shamash Fund Dba the Shamash Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph