Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sgng Foundation Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Youth Development$120kHuman Services$54kEducation$37kHealth$30kScience & Tech$25kPublic Benefit$20kCivil Rights$13kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION$90,000
INDIA COMMUNITY CENTER$20,000
FUNDACION OE - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($298k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($63k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRANDFATHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($63k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$63k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc

To promote civil liberties through communication and interaction with and between the citizens and legislators of the state of florida

Civil Rights
2
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
3
Oritel Inc

Improve the quality of life of handicapped children living in latin american countries or any such countries as may be determined by the board of directors from time to time.

—
4
Hogar Crea International of Florida
Health
5
Vamos Concertacion Ciudadana Inc

"VAMOS Concertacin Ciudadana is a not for profit created for the purpose of educating and organizing communities as to create a better quality of life prosperity and happiness for our communities. It has as its mission to accompany…

Community Improvement
6
Code for Venezuela Inc

Charitable and educational

—
7
Foundation for Argentinean Development
Philanthropy
8
Fundacion Carvajal
—
9
Instituto Socio-Economico Comunitario Inc

To provide information to states, territories, and tribes regarding the distribution of the Community Services Block grant (CSBG) Disaster Supplemental Funds for Hurricanes Fiona and ian and provide quidance on eligibility, distribution,…

—
10
International Community Development Foundation
International
11
Colectivo Ile Corporacion

Educate and research anti-racist and decolonizing work inside and outside of Puerto Rico

Human Services
12
Centro Educativo Integral Formando Vidas Inc

Educational Services

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hogar Cuna De San Cristobal Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fundacion Oe-Innovative Technology for Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bejuco: $40,000 · OtherBejucoBoys and Girls Club: $30,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubFUNDACION OE - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY: $20,000 · OtherFUNDACION OE - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGYUT Southwestern: $20,000 · OtherUT SouthwesternHospital de Nino: $10,000 · OtherHospital de NinoUT Southwestern Medical Center: $10,000 · OtherUT Southwestern Medical CenterFundacion OE: $10,000 · OtherFundacion OE+5 more: $17,700 · Other+5 moreTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INCINDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $46,000 · InternationalINDIA COMMUNIT…FAIRVOTE: $20,000 · Civil RightsFAIRVOTEAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $12,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN C…FUNDACION OE-INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION INC: $12,000 · Science & TechHOGAR CUNA DE SAN CRISTOBAL INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalPUERTO RICO DOWN SINDROME FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthGrandfather Community Foundation Inc: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$157,700Youth Development$90,000International$46,000Civil Rights$32,500Science & Tech$12,000Crime & Legal$10,000Health$10,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetINDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $46,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFUNDACION OE-INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetPUERTO RICO DOWN SINDROME FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGrandfather Community Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sgng Foundation Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sgng Foundation Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sgng Foundation Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Sgng Foundation Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sgng’s filings →

    More from the funding graph