Loading…
· Public charity
SEVENTH STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH
Support church programs and other activities
$143k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$143k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of SEVENTH STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
charitiableprimary exemptexempt ministerminister hungryhungry childrenchildren agingaging adults
2019
hungerprimary exemptexempt ministerminister hungryhungry childrenchildren agingaging adults
2020
—
2021
hungerchildren
2022
—
2023
neighborstogetherbuildshalom farmshealthy food
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$143,002
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SEVENTH STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH$143,002
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$967k · 3 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
9
Total granted
$967k
$155k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+62%
+102%
Still filing today
67%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSEVENTH STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH8× · 2017–2024 · $819k
- SVSHENANDOAH VALLEY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES4× · 2018–2021 · $90k · revenue -36%
- FFEEDMORE2× · 2019–2021 · $58k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- GAGEN ASSEMBLY OF THE CHR CH DISC OF CHRIST INC AKA WEEK OF COMPASSIONone grant, 2017 · $40k
- GAGRACE AND HOPE ACADEMYone grant, 2018 · $25k
- ACAREA CONGREGATIONS TOGETHER IN SERVgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +314%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Feeding Southwest Virginia
To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.
Food & Nutrition
2
Virginia Community Food Connections
To create healthy, food-secure communities and strong, equitable regional food systems by ensuring fresh and local produce is accessible and affordable for all.
Food & Nutrition
3
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia
Leading the effort to eliminate hunger in our community.
Food & Nutrition
4
Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc
Loaves & fishes provides nourishing food with respect and dignity to all who seek assistance, while offering robust opportunities for community engagement through volunteerism, partnerships, and nutrition education.
Food & Nutrition
5
The Lord's Pantry of Shinnston
The organization's mission is to help alleviate hunger in west virginia by operating a local food pantry.
—
6
Plenty Inc
To nourish community and feed hungry neighbors by growing and sharing food in Floyd County, Virginia.
Food & Nutrition
7
Farmer Foodshare Inc
Farmer foodshare reshapes the disconnected food system by removing barriers to growing and accessing local food. we create markets for local farmers and deliver fresh, healthy food to individuals and families experiencing food insecurity…
Food & Nutrition
8
Local Food Hub Inc
Partnering with virginia farmers to increase community access to local food
—
9
Healthy Harvest Food Bank Inc
To provide healthy nutritious food for those in need in the communities served.
Food & Nutrition
10
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries
To provide food and financial support for persons at risk of hunger and homelessness living in western Fairfax County Virginia.
Human Services
11
Feeding My Sheep Inc
The feeding my sheep is a nonprofit organization that wants to work in partnership with people of faith and consience around southwest virginia to end hunger and give hope to the needy. we believe that every person has the basic right to…
Food & Nutrition
12
Sola Gratia Farm
A community-based farm dedicated to producing locally-grown, high-quality, natural produce. responding to the gospel, the farm is committed to helping those who lack adequate food resources by donating a minumum of ten percent of its…
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed More Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sophia Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$904,061Food & Nutrition$164,350Human Services$40,000Housing & Shelter$7,850Arts & Culture$6,105
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation IncVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SEVENTH STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SHENANDOAH VALLEY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 271675977 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SHENANDOAH VALLEY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Seventh Street Christian Church?
Find your warmest path to Seventh Street Christian Church through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines