Skip to content
Sdei Israel Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Sdei Israel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$301k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$909kReligion$908kInternational$9kEducation$8kRecreation & Sports$7kYouth Development$1kCommunity Improvement$650Human Services$640Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $228k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cong Kahal Minchas Chinuch$167,500
Cong Kollel Chesed$60,000
Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov$36,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Mishnah Sheli Inc$6,000
U T A Of Boro Park$5,000
Various$3,500
Cong Imrei Chaim Viznitz$1,200
Bnai Elozer Inc$1,000
Cong Tiferes Moshe Of BP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Torah academy for girls: $7k → 13%Cong Ohel Torah: $6k → 14%Nachlat Yehoshua: $19k → 17%Keren Hadfusa of Breslev: $10k → 20%Cong Bobov Linden: $20k → 10%Cong Obr: $6k → 14%U T A Of Monsey: $15k → 17%Ach Tov V'chesed: $8k → 20%Cong Yesheos Yakov: $6k → 14%U T A Of Monsey: $9k → 17%U T A Of Monsey: $7k → 17%Nachlas Yehoshua: $22k → 20%Nachlas Yehoshua: $20k → 20%Ach Tov V'chesed: $30k → 20%Ach Tov V'chesed: $25k → 20%Mishkan Yecheskel: $19k → 20%Mishkan Yecheskel: $14k → 20%Ach Tov V'chesed: $10k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $341k → 14%CENTRAL CONGREGATIONS OF YETEV LEV DSATMAR: $6k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $225k → 14%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $223k → 14%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $118k → 14%KUPAS EZRAH SHOMRIE CHESED: $12k → 20%U T A Of Monsey: $10k → 14%Various: $10k → 14%TALMUD TORAH TZOIN YOSEF PUPA INC: $8k → 14%KUPAS EZRAH SHOMRIE CHESED: $7k → 20%Cong Khal Chasidei Skwera Inc: $6k → 14%Cong Kollel Chesed: $60k → 20%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $50k → 20%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $45k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $36k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $25k → 20%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $25k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $21k → 20%BOBOVER YESHIVAH BNEI ZION: $19k → 20%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $18k → 20%Nshie Bobov: $18k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $18k → 20%Bayis Ester: $15k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $15k → 20%KHAL UNGVAR DBA MISHNE HALACHOTH GEDOLOTH: $10k → 20%Kedushat Zion: $8k → 20%Cong Kahal Minchas Chinuch: $168k → 20%Yaldeinu School: $8k → 20%Mikva of Kensington: $30k → 20%Mishnah Sheli Inc: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 20 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
56

Total granted

$1.5M
$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+48%

Still filing today

10%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $908k
  • BZ
    BNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $138k
  • KZ
    Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov
    4× · 2021–2025 · $116k

Funded once

  • MO
    MIKVAH OF KENSINGTON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • CB
    CONG BOBOV LINDEN NJ
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • NY
    NACHLAT YEHOSHUA
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
5
Keren Avrum Yosef Inc

To provide assistance to jewish religious schools

Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
7
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
8
Rinas Bais Yaakov Inc

Rinas bais yaakov, inc was established for the charitable purpose of promoting jewish education and jewish identity.

Arts & Culture
9
Yeshiva Birkat Israel Inc

Education services

Religion
10
American Friends of Biala Yeshiva Inc

Support jewish religious education in yeshiva established for instruction under the guidance of the biala rebbi.

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
12
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Neveh Zion; the most unlike its peers is Keren Refuah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $907,560 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTCong Kahal Minchas Chinuch: $167,500 · OtherCong Kahal Minchas ChinuchBNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC: $138,000 · OtherBNOS ZION OF BOBOV INCKollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $115,500 · OtherKollel Zichron Chaim D'bobovACH TOV V CHESED: $77,500 · Other+68 more: $559,830 · Other+68 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA IMREI EMES I: $5,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $2,200 · ReligionFRIENDS OF RE'AIM MESAMCHEI HASHABBOS: $1,200 · ReligionKEREN REFUAH INC: $1,000 · ReligionTHE YALDEINU SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationCONGREGATION BNOS YAKOV: $1,200 · EducationTHE CHABIRA INC: $2,250 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $1,300 · PhilanthropyKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $3,440 · InternationalYeshivas Talmideini Inc: $1,150 · Youth Development
Other$1,965,890Religion$9,400Education$8,700Philanthropy$3,550International$3,440Youth Development$1,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE YALDEINU SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA IMREI EMES I: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $3,440 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $2,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAKOV: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF RE'AIM MESAMCHEI HASHABBOS: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshivas Talmideini Inc: $1,150 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN REFUAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE YALDEINU SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundBirkas Rosh Foundatio…B&M Steinmetz Foundat…S&W Foundation IncCohen Ld Family Found…Yms Foundation IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Chavie Stern Family F…Vyazreim IncNational Society for …Mazal Charitable TrustFund for Life Foundat…
The Ojc FundNY60.2× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · S&W Foundation Inc · Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc · Yms Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Mazal Charitable Trust · Fund for Life Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sdei Israel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sdei Israel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sdei Israel Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sdei Israel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sdei Israel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home