Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of SCOTT & JENNIFER ANDREWS FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Athletics Foundation$15,208
Trinity Episcopal Church$11,000
Truth for Life$5,000
FCA$4,625
The Bridge Ministry Inc$4,500
Grace Ministries$2,000
Pan Mass Challenge$1,000
Teach Beyond$1,000
Community Foundation Tampa Bay$500
Seven Loaves$500
Churches of Upperville Outreach$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Mosaic Virginia: $500 → 4%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $1k → 7%Grace Ministries: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$412k · 15 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
28

Total granted

$412k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+18%

Still filing today

53%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +59%
  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +103%
  • MC
    MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TC
    The College Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • YF
    YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +130%
  • OG
    Oak Grove Christian Ministries
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
National Christian Foundation Orlando Inc

To encourage and facilitate greater charitable giving by offering simple, innovative, and efficient giving tools to support charities, churches, and christian ministries.

Philanthropy
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
7
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
8
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
9
The Wellspring Group

Wellspring provides a discipleship model for individuals and churches to engage as a part of their overall spiritual development. this is done through retreat and small group experiences and through equipping churches and organizations to…

Religion
10
Trinity Broadcasting of Washington

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

Religion
11
Disciples Seminary Foundation of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)

In covenant with the christian church (disciples of christ) and in cooperation with ecumenical and educational partners, disciples seminary foundation serves god through the formation and support of emerging theological leaders for diverse…

Religion
12
Worklife Ministry Inc

To promote and facilitate the highest quality of work life; providing program resources to benefit the region's residents, workplaces and communities.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Curtis Lemair Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Substance Abuse TreatmentCommunity FoundationsLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community Arts OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr14%28%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr15%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr15%10%35–55yr15%37%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,435

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Rector and Visitors of UVA — $74,268 · OtherRector and Visitors of UVAThe College Foundation of UVA — $71,000 · OtherThe College Foundation of UVATrinity Episcopal Church — $52,719 · OtherTrinity Episcopal ChurchFCA — $37,125 · OtherFCALeachman Ministries — $25,000 · OtherLeachman MinistriesThe College Foundation — $20,000 · OtherThe College FoundationMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $12,500 · OtherAbaco-Winding Bay Relief Fund — $11,500 · Other+19 more — $24,177 · Other+19 moreTRUTH FOR LIFE — $35,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFEMEADOWKIRK INC — $30,000 · ReligionMEADOWKIRK INCTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC — $4,500 · ReligionTHE BRIDGE MINIST…Oak Grove Christian Ministries — $2,500 · Religion+3 more — $1,600 · ReligionVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $39,745 · EducationVIRGINIA S…ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $3,250 · EducationST CHRISTO…+2 more — $2,100 · EducationGRACE MINISTRIES — $8,000 · Human ServicesLIFE LINE INC — $500 · Human ServicesYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentUNCOMMON SPORTS GROUP — $2,400 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $2,125 · PhilanthropyTHE JACK KEMP FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $1,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $2,200 · EnvironmentGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · Environment
Other$328,289Religion$73,600Education$45,095Human Services$8,500Youth Development$5,900Philanthropy$5,625Environment$3,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $39,745 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE — $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEADOWKIRK INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC — $9,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGRACE MINISTRIES — $8,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Grove Christian Ministries — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNCOMMON SPORTS GROUP — $2,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $2,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCURTIS LEMAIR LEGACY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATHER MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOORSTEP MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLIFE LINE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY ORPHANS HOPE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST RALEIGH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION — $177 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCHANAN HALL CORPORATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Foundation for Education — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

In His Steps FoundationOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: In His Steps Foundation · Servant Foundation · William M Backer Foundation Inc · Frank Mangano Foundation · Awa Family Foundation · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · Wise Foundation · Dun Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph