Skip to content
Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$274kEducation$97kRecreation & Sports$43kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kHousing & Shelter$9kYouth Development$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Athletics Foundation$15,208
Trinity Episcopal Church$11,000
Truth for Life$5,000
FCA$4,625
The Bridge Ministry Inc$4,500
Grace Ministries$2,000
Pan Mass Challenge$1,000
Teach Beyond$1,000
Community Foundation Tampa Bay$500
Seven Loaves$500
Churches of Upperville Outreach$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Mosaic Virginia: $500 → 4%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $2k → 7%Grace Ministries: $1k → 7%Grace Ministries: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 15 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
28

Total granted

$412k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+11%

Still filing today

53%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +59%
  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +103%
  • MC
    MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TC
    The College Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • AP
    A Place to Be Music Therapy
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • YF
    YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +130%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
National Christian Foundation Orlando Inc

To encourage and facilitate greater charitable giving by offering simple, innovative, and efficient giving tools to support charities, churches, and christian ministries.

Philanthropy
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
7
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
8
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
9
The Wellspring Group

Wellspring provides a discipleship model for individuals and churches to engage as a part of their overall spiritual development. this is done through retreat and small group experiences and through equipping churches and organizations to…

Religion
10
Trinity Broadcasting of Washington

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

Religion
11
Disciples Seminary Foundation of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)

In covenant with the christian church (disciples of christ) and in cooperation with ecumenical and educational partners, disciples seminary foundation serves god through the formation and support of emerging theological leaders for diverse…

Religion
12
Worklife Ministry Inc

To promote and facilitate the highest quality of work life; providing program resources to benefit the region's residents, workplaces and communities.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Curtis Lemair Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rector and Visitors of UVA: $74,268 · OtherRector and Visitors of UVAThe College Foundation of UVA: $71,000 · OtherThe College Foundation of UVATrinity Episcopal Church: $52,719 · OtherTrinity Episcopal ChurchFCA: $37,125 · OtherFCALeachman Ministries: $25,000 · OtherLeachman MinistriesThe College Foundation: $20,000 · OtherThe College FoundationMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 · OtherAbaco-Winding Bay Relief Fund: $11,500 · Other+19 more: $24,177 · Other+19 moreTRUTH FOR LIFE: $35,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFEMEADOWKIRK INC: $30,000 · ReligionMEADOWKIRK INCTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC: $4,500 · ReligionTHE BRIDGE MINIST…Oak Grove Christian Ministries: $2,500 · Religion+3 more: $1,600 · ReligionVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $39,745 · EducationVIRGINIA S…ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,250 · EducationST CHRISTO…+2 more: $2,100 · EducationGRACE MINISTRIES: $8,000 · Human ServicesLIFE LINE INC: $500 · Human ServicesYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentUNCOMMON SPORTS GROUP: $2,400 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2,125 · PhilanthropyTHE JACK KEMP FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $1,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $2,200 · EnvironmentGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Environment
Other$328,289Religion$73,600Education$45,095Human Services$8,500Youth Development$5,900Philanthropy$5,625Environment$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $39,745 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEADOWKIRK INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $9,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGRACE MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Grove Christian Ministries: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNCOMMON SPORTS GROUP: $2,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATHER MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS LEMAIR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOORSTEP MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEVERY ORPHANS HOPE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE LINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST RALEIGH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $177 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Foundation for Education: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCHANAN HALL CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

In His Steps Foundati…Servant FoundationWilliam M Backer Foun…Frank Mangano Foundat…Awa Family FoundationThe Luminescence Foun…Wise FoundationDun FoundationFauquier Health Found…Christian Community F…The Community Foundat…Shell USA Company Fou…
In His Steps FoundationOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: In His Steps Foundation · Servant Foundation · William M Backer Foundation Inc · Frank Mangano Foundation · Awa Family Foundation · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · Wise Foundation · Dun Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scott & Jennifer Andrews Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home