Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schulz Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$2.0MHuman Services$73kEducation$60kInternational$48kHousing & Shelter$36kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$20kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $174k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BOZENA AND JOSEF ZELENDA CHARIT$1,808,330
THE BOZENA AND JOSEF ZELENDA CHARIT$173,669
HAND IN HAND$12,500
UNLIMITED POTENTIAL$7,500
VETERANS ON DECK$7,500
SPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS$5,000
ACCEL$5,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$5,000
RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM$5,000
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$5,000
NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH$3,000
SHELTER BOX$1,000
FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS$1,000
JUSTA CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $8k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $8k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%MERCY CENTER MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%SPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $5k → 15%MERCY CENTER MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%MERCY CENTER MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%SPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $5k → 15%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $3k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $1k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $1k → 11%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $10k → 11%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $8k → 11%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $8k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 17 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2020, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$295k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
-25%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +68%
  • UP
    UNLIMITED POTENTIAL INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +646%
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +93%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -25%
  • OA
    OPEN ARMS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Arc of Arizona Inc

Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…

—
4
Disability Rights Arizona

DRAZ is a non-profit law firm that assists Arizonans with disabilities to promote and protect their legal rights to independence, justice, and equality.

Civil Rights
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
6
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
7
Jewish Family & Children's Service of Southern Arizona Inc

Jewish family & children's services of southern arizona helps all people meet their full potential by providing expert community and behavioral health services.

Human Services
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
10
Phoenix Jewish Community Kivel Nursing Home

Operation of assisted living facilities

Health
11
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
12
Direct Center for Independence Inc

Mission Advocated disability voice, choice, and independenceVision Universal access and justice

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Special Needs Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOZENA AND JOSEF ZELENDA CHARIT: $1,981,999 · OtherTHE BOZENA AND JOSEF ZELENDA CHARIT+10 more: $97,000 · OtherUNLIMITED POTENTIAL INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 · Human ServicesDEFENDERS OF CHILDREN: $20,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CENTER MINISTRIES: $15,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $15,000 · Human ServicesFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $42,500 · InternationalNew Pathways For Youth: $18,000 · Crime & LegalWaste Not Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionACCEL: $13,500 · EducationFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $10,000 · Religion
Other$2,078,999Human Services$117,750International$42,500Crime & Legal$18,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Education$13,500Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $42,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNLIMITED POTENTIAL INC: $25,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDEFENDERS OF CHILDREN: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS: $15,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWaste Not Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACCEL: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $6,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds UNLIMITED POTENTIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDERS OF CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CENTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL NEEDS SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Waste Not Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCEL ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bozena And Josef Zelenda FoundationAZ26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bozena And Josef Zelenda Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Valley of the Sun United Way · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · American Express Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schulz Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schulz Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schulz Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Schulz Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schulz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph