Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schubert Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$79kEducation$52kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$10kCrime & Legal$6kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIV FOUNDATION INC$10,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION$7,500
BACKYARD PLAYERS AND FRIENDS$5,000
LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION$5,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA$5,000
CASA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BACKYARD PLAYERS AND FRIENDS: $5k → 6%PRIDE CENTER AT EQUALITY PARK: $5k → 13%BACKYARD PLAYERS AND FRIENDS: $5k → 6%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 6 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$139k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+22%

Still filing today

83%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $59k · revenue +33%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +0%
  • 8I
    826CHI INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • THE NIGHT MINISTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -12%
  • TG
    THE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Potential Inc

Potential engages children and adults with autism in personalized programs that help them realize their full potential.

Human Services
2
The Hope School

The hope learning academy serves children with intellectual/developmental disabilities and neurological disorders and their families by providing homes in which to grow, schools in which to learn, clinics in which to become healthier,…

Education
3
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
4
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
5
Life Concepts Inc

Quest's mission is to help people with developmental disabilities experience a full life. quest provides lifelong services to support children and adults with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
6
Westchester School for Special Children

To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.

—
7
Down Syndrome Assn of Central Texas

The mission of the down syndrome association of central texas (dsact)is to provide education, support, and resources to individuals with down syndrome, their families, professionals, and the community while building public awareness and…

—
8
King Street Center Inc

King street center empowers youth to explore their talents and find their voice through learning, play, and opportunity.

Human Services
9
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
10
Depaul Community Resources

Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…

—
11
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
12
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little City Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Face Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $59,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE CITY FOUNDATIONBACKYARD PLAYERS & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBACKYARD PLAYERS & FRIENDS INCTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYTHE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…826CHI INC: $11,500 · Education826CHI INCWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CE…CASA: $6,000 · OtherCASAPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCOMPANIES THAT CARE: $2,500 · OtherCOMPANIES THAT CAREGIVING GROUP COMMUNITY: $2,000 · OtherGIVING GROUP COMMUN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $12,500 · HealthPLANNED P…FACE AUTISM INC: $2,500 · HealthFACE AUTI…Cake4kids: $2,500 · Youth Development
Human Services$79,000Education$51,500Other$30,500Health$15,000Youth Development$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $59,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget826CHI INC: $11,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBACKYARD PLAYERS & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCake4kids: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFACE AUTISM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schubert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schubert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schubert Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schubert Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schubert Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph