Skip to content
Schneid Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Schneid Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$167kHuman Services$11kEducation$5kHousing & Shelter$4kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$965Youth Development$500Other$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $61,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $156,938 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $95,288 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ohr Shlomo Chassidic Center$14,500
Kehilas Yeshorim of Wesley Hills$10,000
Congregation Ateres Rosh Inc.$10,000
Ashar Adolph Schreiber Hebrew Academy of Rockland$5,000
Our Place in NY Inc.$4,000
Vyazreim Inc.$3,500
Yeshiva Katana of Passaic$3,500
Khal Zichron Shulem Dorshava$2,500
My Extended Family$2,000
Various$1,920
Tomche Shabbos of Rockland$1,800
Congregation Borov Inc.$1,360
Bike 4 Chai$500
Torah Academy of Boca Raton$360
Cental Tzedakah$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%My Extended Family: $7k → 20%My Extended Family: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 9 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
25

Total granted

$85k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+7%

Still filing today

33%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +137%
  • TS
    TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +39%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $540 · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • YY
    Yeshias Yisroel
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CB
    CONG BNOS DEVORAH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • CP
    CONGREGATION POMONA HEIGHTS
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
2
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
3
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
4
Zichron Tzvi Elimelech

Assists thousands of needy individuals, families and multiplecharities in Israel and North America.

—
5
Zichron Dovid Hakohen Inc

To provide financial assistance, including food and shelter, to needy individuals.

Human Services
6
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
7
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
8
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
9
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
Tzidkas Binyomin Inc

Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.

Philanthropy
12
Kolel America Tiphereth Jerusalem

Supports various religious activities in israel.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is My Extended Family Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMO: $27,500 · OtherCONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMOCONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED: $20,500 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESEDAteres Bais Yaakov Academy of Rockl: $20,061 · OtherAteres Bais Yaakov Academy of RocklYeshias Yisroel: $20,000 · OtherYeshias YisroelCONG BNOS DEVORAH INC: $15,000 · OtherCONG BNOS DEVORAH INCOhr Shlomo Chassidic Center: $14,500 · OtherOhr Shlomo Chassidic CenterKehilas Yeshorim of Wesley Hills: $10,000 · OtherCongregation Ateres Rosh Inc.: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $52,061 · Other+33 moreMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $8,250 · Human ServicesTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,579 · Food & NutritionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $540 · HealthLev Leyeled Inc: $500 · HealthKAPAYIM INC: $240 · HealthTHE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC: $1,000 · InternationalROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $185 · PhilanthropySMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INC: $180 · PhilanthropyVYAZREIM INC: $180 · Public BenefitTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $180 · Religion
Other$189,622Human Services$8,250Food & Nutrition$1,579Health$1,280International$1,000Philanthropy$365Public Benefit$180Religion$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $8,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,579 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLev Leyeled Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $185 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Lev Leyeled Inc ↗
  • Who funds KUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundJ & E Wolf Foundation…Mkz Charity Foundatio…Eisenberg Family Foun…Chaim V'Shulem Founda…Bochner FoundationThe Gds FoundationGreenzweig Family Fou…Zelig and Rifky Weiss…The Jmg Foundation
The Ojc FundNY32.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · J & E Wolf Foundation Inc · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc · Bochner Foundation · The Gds Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schneid Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schneid Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $195k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schneid Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home