Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scheible Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$272k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$320kArts & Culture$310kScience & Tech$290kHealth$250kInternational$150kYouth Development$43kCommunity Improvement$15kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$100,000
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$50,000
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$30,000
CARTER CENTER$15,000
REDSOURCE INC$15,000
WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER$15,000
ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL$15,000
JACK'S BASKET$10,000
HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL$5,000
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY & AQUARIUM$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTA$5,000
VICTORY GALLOP$5,000
GEORGIA PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JACK'S BASKET: $10k → 14%MOTE MARINE LABORATORY & AQUARIUM: $10k → 9%CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION: $13k → 15%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $10k → 17%CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $20k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $20k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40k → 19%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $15k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $15k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $15k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $15k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $10k → 13%CARTER CENTER: $10k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $10k → 13%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $25k → 14%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $25k → 13%REDSOURCE INC: $15k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $15k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $15k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $15k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+165%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $155k · revenue +113%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +165%
  • ZS
    ZACHOR SHOAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
12
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Purdue Research Foundation: $270,000 · EducationPurdue Research FoundationAtlanta Speech School Inc: $120,000 · EducationAtlanta Speech School IncHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $24,500 · Education+2 moreCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherCHI OMEGA FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $125,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTATHE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARD: $100,000 · OtherTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL GRANT AWARDMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $20,000 · OtherREDSOURCE INC: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $200,000 · Arts & CultureWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL AS…ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CE…THE CARTER CENTER INC: $150,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER C…Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $43,000 · Youth DevelopmentVICTORY GALLOP INC: $15,000 · HealthJACK'S BASKET: $10,000 · Health
Education$434,500Other$420,000Arts & Culture$310,000International$150,000Youth Development$43,000Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $270,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Speech School Inc: $120,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $43,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY GALLOP INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJACK'S BASKET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY GALLOP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK'S BASKET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scheible Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scheible Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scheible Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph