Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sarah W George Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$280kHuman Services$257kEducation$100kEnvironment$75kHousing & Shelter$55kArts & Culture$41kHealth$30kReligion$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$936k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE CARE INC$50,000
LOVEXTENSION INC$25,000
HAND IN HAND LAKE COUNTY INC$25,000
STETSON UNVI SPRING HILL COMMUNITY$20,000
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVEXTENSION INC: $25k → 10%LOVEXTENSION INC: $5k → 16%LOVEXTENSION INC: $5k → 10%LOVEXTENSION INC: $5k → 16%LOVEXTENSION INC: $5k → 10%LOVEXTENSION INC: $4k → 10%SUNRISE ARC INC: $5k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $50k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $50k → 10%LAKE CARE INC: $50k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $50k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $25k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$783k · 11 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +130% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$783k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+130%
+12%

Still filing today

64%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lake Cares Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +193%
  • HI
    Hand in Hand Lake County Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $128k · revenue +130%
  • TL
    TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +602%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AF
    AUDUBON FLORIDA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MD
    MOUNT DORA TRUST FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakeland Performing Arts Association Inc
2
Lake Wales Arts Council Inc

Promotion of the visual and performing arts in lake wales, florida

Arts & Culture
3
Lake County Center for Independent Living

To empower people with disabilities to lead self-directed lives as valued members of the community.

Human Services
4
Lee County Arts & Community Center

Providing operating space to non-profit organizations

Arts & Culture
5
Lake County Economic Development Corporation
6
Lake County Senior Citizens Association

To Provide Services, Energy, Assistance, and Meals on Wheels to local Seniors and other low income individuals in need.

Human Services
7
University Center of Lake County

The university center of lake county provides facilities and support services for its member colleges and universities in delivering higher education programs to lake county students.

Education
8
Dade County Senior Citizens Center
Human Services
9
Lake Technical College Inc

To meet the educational needs of the community by offering a variety of high quality vocational and technical training opportunities for high school and adult students. the college is a post secondary technical college.

Education
10
Pads Lake County Inc

The mission of PADS Lake County is to stand as a community based organization that provides trauma-informed support, resources, and shelter to individuals and families experiencing a housing crisis. We envision a community in which…

Health
11
Lake County Public Library

To provide the highest quality informational, educational, cultural and recreational resources and services to residents of all ages in the lake county public.

Education
12
Flagler County Art League Inc

To provide art education and exhibit art by local artists for the enrichment and benefit of the public in Flagler and surrounding counties, Florida.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Dora Center for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Forward Paths Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lake Cares Inc — $280,000 · Human ServicesLake Cares IncLOVEXTENSION INC — $48,500 · Human ServicesLOVEXTENSION INC+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesSTETSON UNVI SPRING HILL COMMUNITY — $60,000 · OtherSTETSON UNVI SPRING HIL…STETSON UNIV SPRING HILL COMMUNITY — $35,000 · OtherSTETSON UNIV SPRING HIL…SHEPHERD'S HOPE'S HEALTH CENTER — $19,000 · OtherSHEPHERD'S HOPE'S HEALT…CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA — $15,000 · OtherCENTRAL FLORIDA YMCATHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $11,000 · OtherTHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENT…AUDUBON FLORIDA — $10,000 · OtherAUDUBON FLORIDAMOUNT DORA TRUST FUND — $7,500 · OtherCORONADO COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $6,000 · Other+3 more — $8,500 · OtherHand in Hand Lake County Inc — $127,500 · HealthHand in Hand Lake…TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentTROUT LAKE…STETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $52,000 · EducationFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentMOUNT DORA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureBAY STREET PLAYERS INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureLAKE EUSTIS MUSEUM OF ART INC — $1,800 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$333,500Other$172,000Health$127,500Environment$75,000Education$52,000Youth Development$50,000Arts & Culture$33,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLake Cares Inc — $280,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetHand in Hand Lake County Inc — $127,500 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetTROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC — $75,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $52,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetLOVEXTENSION INC — $48,500 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetMOUNT DORA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $25,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSUNRISEARC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE EUSTIS MUSEUM OF ART INC — $1,800 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Cares Inc
  • Who funds Hand in Hand Lake County Inc
  • Who funds TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC
  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LOVEXTENSION INC
  • Who funds MOUNT DORA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds BAY STREET PLAYERS INC
  • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC
  • Who funds LAKE EUSTIS MUSEUM OF ART INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles B & Mary M McLin FoundationFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles B & Mary M McLin Foundation · W T Bland Jr Charitable Tua · United Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sarah W George Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Stetson University Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sarah W George Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Sarah W George Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph