Skip to content

· Private foundation

Santo Maria Frank & John Zanetti Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$446k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$736kHuman Services$701kAnimals$515kPhilanthropy$495kFood & Nutrition$183kRecreation & Sports$177kHealth$110kArts & Culture$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $295k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BATTLE CREEK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$70,000
KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$60,000
BCACS FOUNDATION$60,000
ALL SPECIES KINSHIP$55,000
SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK$50,000
BINDER PARK ZOO$40,000
BATTLE CREEK ACADEMY$30,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES$20,000
SHERMAN LAKE YMCA CAMP$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
ALANO CLUB$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HAVEN OF REST MISSION$7,000
HAVEN OF REST MISSION$7,000
HAVEN OF REST MISSION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHERMAN LAKE YMCA: $15k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $20k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $20k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $12k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $10k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $7k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $5k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $3k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $3k → 12%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $11k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $10k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $8k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 19 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+35%

Still filing today

47%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue +168%
  • Binder Park Zoological Society Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +74%
  • SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Centergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +35%
  • HC
    HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
2
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
3
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
6
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
7
Community Financial Credit Union

Community financial credit union is a state chartered, not-for-profit, full-service financial institution owned and governed by its membership. at community financial, we are committed to our members and our communities,for over 70 years.…

—
8
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
11
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
12
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Battle Creek Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vineyard Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BCACS FOUNDATION: $410,000 · OtherBCACS FOUNDATIONBATTLE CREEK ACADEMY AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $215,000 · OtherBATTLE CREEK ACADEMY AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $183,000 · OtherSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANKSHERMAN LAKE YMCA CAMP: $165,000 · OtherSHERMAN LAKE YMCA CAMPHAVEN OF REST MISSION: $98,000 · OtherHAVEN OF REST MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $48,000 · Other+11 more: $85,500 · Other+11 moreBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $355,000 · AnimalsBinder Park Zoolog…ALL SPECIES KINSHIP: $160,000 · AnimalsALL SPECIES KINSHI…KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $505,000 · EducationKELLOGG COMMUNITY …BATTLE CREEK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $495,000 · PhilanthropyBATTLE CREEK COMMU…FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $79,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE: $63,000 · Human ServicesSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $54,000 · Human ServicesSherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $15,000 · Human ServicesKINGMAN MUSEUM INC: $51,000 · Arts & CultureBronson Health Foundation: $30,000 · HealthCIR INC: $12,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,269,500Animals$515,000Education$505,000Philanthropy$495,000Human Services$211,000Arts & Culture$51,000Health$30,000Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $505,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetBATTLE CREEK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $495,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $355,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $183,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALL SPECIES KINSHIP: $160,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $79,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE PLACE: $63,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $54,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKINGMAN MUSEUM INC: $51,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetBronson Health Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVINEYARD ACADEMY: $16,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetSherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCIR INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetALANO CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KELLOGG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BATTLE CREEK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Binder Park Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALL SPECIES KINSHIP ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
  • Who funds KINGMAN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Bronson Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VINEYARD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center ↗
  • Who funds CIR INC ↗
  • Who funds ALANO CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Battle Creek Community FoundationMI32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Battle Creek Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · Miller Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Feldpausch Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Burnham Family Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Guido a Binda and Elizabeth H Binda Foundation · Preston S and Barbara J Parish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Santo Maria Frank & John Zanetti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Santo Maria Frank & John Zanetti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Santo Maria Frank & John Zanetti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph