Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandstone Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$52kEnvironment$9kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$3kEducation$2kSocial Science$2kHealth$1kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GPS EDUCATION PARTNERS$35,000
MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART$30,200
MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART AND DESIGN INC$20,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$5,000
URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC$2,500
ECONOMICS WISCONSIN$2,000
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$2,000
SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE INC$2,000
ST GEORGE VILLAGE BOTANICAL GARDEN OF ST CROIX INC$1,000
META HOUSE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE INC: $2k → 15%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $1k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $250 → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 13 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$118k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+17%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +69%
  • MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +2%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF WI ART
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
8
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
9
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
10
Milwaukee Public Museum Inc

The milwaukee public museum inspires curiosity, excites minds and increases desire to preserve and protect our world's natural and cultural diversity through exhibitions, educational programs, collections and research.

Arts & Culture
11
Midwest Energy Research Consortium Inc

Driving innovation for the energy, power, and controls sector by synchronizing market insights, technology innovation and talent & start-up development into a new innovation engine for economic development and growth.

—
12
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is The St George Village Botanical Garden of St Croix Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $41,000 · Arts & CultureGPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INCMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $30,200 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INCMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $40,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INCMUSEUM OF WI ART: $20,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF WI ARTECONOMICS WISCONSIN: $3,500 · Other+4 more: $5,000 · Other+4 moreURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $8,500 · EnvironmentTHE ST GEORGE VILLAGE BOTANICAL GARDEN OF ST CROIX INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $4,000 · EducationSojourner Truth House Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $1,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$81,700Other$68,500Environment$11,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Education$4,000Human Services$3,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST GEORGE VILLAGE BOTANICAL GARDEN OF ST CROIX INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandstone Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandstone Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandstone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph