Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sander Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$131kHealth$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kReligion$27kRecreation & Sports$26kHuman Services$14kInternational$10kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$1,090
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESC$67,092
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WA GOLF FOUNDATION$15,000
EPIPHANY$9,000
GARFIELD$8,469
Individual grant recipient$6,099
ODEA HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
LAKESIDE$1,090
TETON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,029
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$1,000
AMERICAS CHARITIES$1,000
PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%RYTHER: $41k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
OH
UT
CO
VA
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 13 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$316k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+23%

Still filing today

23%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DESC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $177k
  • SP
    Seattle Police Foundation
    2× · 2021–2023 · $46k · revenue +33%
  • E
    EPIPHANY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +10%
  • R
    RYTHERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $41k · revenue +45%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
2
Seattle Public Library Foundation

The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.

Education
3
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
4
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
5
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
6
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
7
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
8
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
9
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
10
Washington Technology Industry Association

To foster a robust, equity-centered technology sector that empowers thriving communities.

—
11
CRAFT3

To build a thriving, just and empowered pacific northwest using capital, relationships and voice.

Community Improvement
12
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DESC: $177,092 · OtherDESCIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEPIPHANY: $23,500 · OtherEPIPHANYIndividual grant recipient: $22,185 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEATTLE ACADEMY: $21,595 · OtherSEATTLE ACADEMYWA GOLF FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherWA GOLF FOUNDATION+28 more: $58,272 · Other+28 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHI…+1 more: $2,340 · EducationSeattle Police Foundation: $45,602 · Crime & LegalRYTHER: $41,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,040 · Human ServicesREACH MINISTRY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Community ImprovementTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $2,030 · Environment
Other$372,644Education$102,340Crime & Legal$45,602Human Services$43,040Philanthropy$10,000Community Improvement$6,000Environment$2,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle Police Foundation: $45,602 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetRYTHER: $41,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREACH MINISTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEPIPHANY SCHOOL: $2,340 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADDIE'S PLACE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE TENNIS CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place: $472 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RYTHER ↗
  • Who funds REACH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EPIPHANY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds MADDIE'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE TENNIS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sander Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sander Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sander Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sander Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sander Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph