Skip to content
San Kiang Charitable Association Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

San Kiang Charitable Association Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$17kInternational$12kHealth$7kCommunity Improvement$5kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kReligion$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Windows & Children's Fund$2,000
New York Chinse opera society Innc$1,000
CPC Open Door Senior Center$1,000
Asian Health Institute$1,000
China Town Day Care Center Inc$500
New York Chinese School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Boys Town: $300 → 12%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%Boys Town: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%Boys Town: $200 → 12%China Town Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%Chinatown Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%China Town Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%China Town Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%CHINA TOWN DAY CARE CENTER: $500 → 17%Chinatown Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%CHINA TOWN DAY CARE CENTER: $500 → 17%China Town Day Care Center Inc: $500 → 17%CELESTIAL LOVE FOUNDATION: $332 → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $1k → 17%Chinese-American Planning Council Inc: $1k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $1k → 17%Chinese-American Planning Council Inc: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 23 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$46k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    Chinatown Day Care Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +125%
  • CP
    CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHINESE CONSULATE -GENERAL IN NEW YORK
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • WC
    Windows & Cildren's Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • CP
    Chinese-American Planning Council In
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
Sunset Park Health Council Inc

The mission of the family health centers at nyu langone is to improve the overall health of the communities it serves by delivering high quality, culturally-competent primary car, and related services within community-based settings.

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
8
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
9
Newyork-Presbyterianqueens

To be the premier healthcare institution serving our greater community by providing excellence in clinical care and patient safety, education, clinical research, and service.

Health
10
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
11
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
12
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Celestial Love Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINESE CONSULATE -GENERAL IN NEW YORK: $12,000 · OtherCHINESE CONSULATE -GENERAL IN NEW YORKNEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherNEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOLWindows & Children's Fund: $4,000 · OtherWindows & Children's FundAmerican Red Cross: $3,300 · OtherAmerican Red CrossIndividual grant recipient: $3,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCPC Open Door Senior Center: $3,000 · OtherCPC Open Door Senior CenterAsian Health Institute: $3,000 · OtherAsian Health InstituteCHURCH OF THE TRANSFIGURATION: $2,500 · OtherWindows & Cildren's Fund: $2,000 · OtherNew York Chinse opera society Innc: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $9,000 · Other+10 moreChinatown Day Care Center Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesChinatown Day Care…CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN P…Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,200 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human Services+2 more: $532 · Human ServicesMARCH OF DIMES INC: $900 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $400 · HealthCITY HARVEST INC: $1,200 · Food & NutritionFRESH AIR FUND: $1,200 · Recreation & SportsNEW YORK CHINESE OPERA SOCIETY INC: $300 · Arts & Culture
Other$47,950Human Services$10,232Health$1,800Food & Nutrition$1,200Recreation & Sports$1,200Arts & Culture$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChinatown Day Care Center Inc: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL: $4,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York City Rescue Mission: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCELESTIAL LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $332 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK CHINESE OPERA SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chinatown Day Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds New York City Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CELESTIAL LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CHINESE OPERA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Kiang Charitable Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Kiang Charitable Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Kiang Charitable Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home