Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Juan Healthcare Foundation Inc

We develop resources that go towards the improvement of health and wellness in the montrose region.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$306k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.5MEducation$33kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$8kInternational$6kYouth Development$6kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$305,769
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$305,769
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Volunteers Of America: $8k → 11%MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1.7M → 12%MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH: $306k → 12%MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $306k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $50k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $20k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $19k → 12%Montrose Memorial Hospital Inc: $15k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $14k → 12%Montrose County School District: $13k → 12%MONTROSE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $10k → 12%THE PIC PLACE: $10k → 12%MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $9k → 12%THE PIC PLACE: $9k → 12%BLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $6k → 12%MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH: $6k → 12%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NATIONAL SERVICES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$2.5M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+31%

Still filing today

20%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.0M
  • MM
    MONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $449k · revenue +81%
  • MC
    MONTROSE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1J
    2× · 2018–2022 · $25k

Funded once

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA HOME HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -44%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER SUPPORT GROUP OF SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +62%
  • BC
    BLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Community Health Foundation

The bch foundation inspires giving in support of bch to enhance the quality and availability of health care in our community.

Health
2
Vna Health

Vna health provides home health and hospice services to patients in santa barbara and the surrounding area.

Health
3
Montana Hospital Association

Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.

4
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Colorado Visiting Nurse Association

Colorado visiting nurse association is committed to a continuum of health care in the home and community supporting optimal well-being, independence, and dignity.

Health
6
Boulder Community Health

To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.

Health
7
Hospice of Montezuma Inc

Hospice of montezuma is a community non-profit organization of dedicated professionals and volunteers providing end of life care, support, and guidance to all individuals and families of montezuma and dolores counties in southwest colorado.

Human Services
8
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
9
Munson Medical Group

To grow and develop a highly effective, multi-regional physician practice that is a central component of a community-focused, vertically integrated health care delivery system supporting the operations of munson medical center with a…

Health
10
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
11
Munson Medical Center

As a vital part of munson healthcare, munson medical center exists to deliver comprehensive quality care to patients in partnership with physicians.

Health
12
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Home Health Services and the most unlike its peers is Community Dental Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $2,033,407 · OtherMONTROSE REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC+5 more — $75,325 · OtherMONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $449,159 · HealthMONTROSE MEMORIAL HO…COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC — $18,750 · HealthBREAST CANCER SUPPORT GROUP OF SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO INC — $6,000 · InternationalBLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $5,910 · Youth Development
Other$2,108,732Health$467,909International$6,000Youth Development$5,910

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTROSE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $449,159 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMontrose Community Foundation — $25,050 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC — $18,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA HOME HEALTH SERVICES — $8,201 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER SUPPORT GROUP OF SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO INC — $6,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $5,910 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NATIONAL SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Juan Healthcare Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph