Skip to content

· Private foundation

Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$235k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$160k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’20
3
’21
2
’22
4
’23
4
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$384kEducation$150kHuman Services$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kYouth Development$19kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$160,000
COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION$30,000
RISE FOUNDATION$20,000
ENABLING LEADERSHIP$18,865
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA$6,248
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($616k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($79k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RISE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%Children's Home Society of Florida: $7k → 13%RISE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $9k → 13%RISE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $6k → 13%RISE Foundation: $15k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($79k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$79k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 62% of Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 4 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$162k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RISE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +79% · 32% of their budget
  • CH
    Child Help Foundation
    2× · 2021–2023 · $50k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $27k · revenue -13%

Funded once

  • AP
    ASU PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +8%
  • SJ
    Shri Jalaram Arogya Seva Trust
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • GS
    Girl Scouts of Southeast Florida Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scout Council of the Southern Appalachians Inc

To provide direct services to the community for the advancement and development of girls and young women.

Youth Development
2
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
3
Foundations Inc

Foundations is dedicated to improving the quality of education for our nation's most vulnerable children by strengthening the skills of educators through professional learning. foundations, inc. is a not-for-profit educational service…

—
4
Advantage Testing Foundation

Our mission is to advance the academic and professional aspirations of underrepresented students of modest means, thereby expanding our nation's leadership pool. we provide educational tutoring, standardized test preparation and academic…

Education
5
The Children's Home Inc

To unlock the potential of at-risk children and families by providing compassionate and effective services that create opportunities for success.

Health
6
The Partnership for After School Education Inc

The partnership for after school education is a child-focused organization that promotes and supports quality after school programs, particularly those serving young people from underserved communities. the partnership for after school…

Education
7
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
8
Room to Read

Room to read envisions a world free from illiteracy and gender inequality, where all children have room to read, learn and grow.

Education
9
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

—
10
Girls Leadership Academy of Wilmington Foundation

Glow academy, a public charter school, educates young women from diverse backgrounds through middle and high school in a nurturing community with a rigorous college preparatory curriculum to develop leaders who succeed in college and…

Education
11
She's the First Inc

She's the first (stf) teams up with grassroots leaders to make sure girls everywhere are educated, respected, and heard. our vision is a world where every girl can choose her own future.

Human Services
12
Girl Scouts of Gulfcoast Florida Inc

Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. Girl Scouting is girl led, where girls work together and learn collaboratively and experientially. Girls work under the guidance, coaching…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asu Preparatory Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rise Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $384,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTRISE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Human ServicesRISE FOUNDATIONTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $27,158 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S H…ASU PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $70,000 · EducationASU PREPARATORY …COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationCOLLIN COUNTY CO…Child Help Foundation: $50,003 · OtherChild Help F…Shri Jalaram Arogya Seva Trust: $28,500 · OtherShri Jalaram…ENABLING LEADERSHIP INC: $18,865 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentONE LIFE TO LOVE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 · International
Philanthropy$384,000Human Services$102,158Education$100,000Other$78,503Youth Development$19,365International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $384,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRISE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetASU PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $27,158 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENABLING LEADERSHIP INC: $18,865 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetONE LIFE TO LOVE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetGirl Scouts of Southeast Florida Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samata - Equal Footing - Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samata - Equal Footing -’s filings →

More from the funding graph