Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam I Kobata & Sons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$461k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.2MRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $247k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$88,500
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$56,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$36,000
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$35,000
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$32,000
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$28,000
BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$28,000
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$23,500
WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$18,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$12,000
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$12,000
CORBAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $52k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY (IDAHO): $16k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $21k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $55k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $52k → 12%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $18k → 13%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $141k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $41k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY (IDAHO): $16k → 22%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $39k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $52k → 12%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15k → 13%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $130k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $36k → 16%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $35k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $35k → 12%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15k → 13%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $124k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $29k → 16%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $32k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $91k → 14%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $28k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $31k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $89k → 14%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $28k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $73k → 14%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $23k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $62k → 14%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $60k → 14%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $58k → 14%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $29k → 14%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $16k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $28k → 14%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25k → 14%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $22k → 14%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $22k → 14%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $22k → 14%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17k → 14%SPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
OR
WY
CA
UT
AZ
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 26 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$3.2M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+14%

Still filing today

19%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +42%
  • WU
    WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +15%
  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UT
    UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +14%
  • SF
    SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
2
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
3
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
4
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Lehigh University

Lehigh university strives to earn international prominence as a universty of special distinction and provide students with opportunities for success through its integration of teaching, research and service to society.

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering students undergraduate and graduate courses.

Education
9
Dordt University

Dordt university was founded in 1955 and provides christ-centered education for students, alumni, and the broader community.

Education
10
Clarkson University

Provide education for undergraduate, graduate, and professional continuing education programs, and to engage in high quality research and scholarship.

Education
11
Westminster College

Promote education, the development of skills, knowledge, and personal qualities.

Education
12
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is Treasure Valley Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,011,168 · OtherBIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGEWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $668,853 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $430,603 · OtherEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $346,835 · OtherCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $158,000 · Other+24 more: $443,750 · Other+24 moreCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $54,300 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationNorthwestern University: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,059,209Education$133,300Recreation & Sports$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $54,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman JfWA14.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam I Kobata & Sons Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam I Kobata & Sons Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sam I Kobata & Sons Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sam I Kobata & Sons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sam I Kobata & Sons’ filings →

More from the funding graph