Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010 Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$105kYouth Development$10kEducation$8kPhilanthropy$1kHealth$1kReligion$340Arts & Culture$265
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$695
Median grant
1
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLACKAMAS HIGH SCHOOL$9,821
ADRIENNE C NELSON HIGH SCHOOL$8,538
MILWAUKIE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION$2,392
CLACKAMAS JUNIOR BASEBALL$1,500
TWELVE STEP RECOVERY LEAGUE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HAPPY VALLEY PREP BASKETBALL$695
TUALATIN FASTPITCH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MILWAUKIE HIGH SCHOOL$330
GLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL$250
OREGON CITY HIGH SCHOOL$250
GRAND VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH$200
MILWAUKIE WRESTLING CLUB$165
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EASTSIDE TIMBERS: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 24 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
28

Total granted

$107k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

13%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLACKAMAS HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k
  • AC
    ADRIENNE C NELSON HIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $29k
  • MH
    MILWAUKIE HIGH SCHOOL PTSA
    4× · 2019–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tualatin Lacrosse Club

Lacrosse Club for high school students

Youth Development
2
Corvallis Baseball Softball Association

The Corvallis Baseball Softball Association operates to provide youth baseball and softball leagues and playing fields for the community to enjoy, promoting the growth of recreational activities for children and teens.

Recreation & Sports
3
Portland Youth Soccer Association

To provide the youth of Portland area communities with the opportunity to experience the joy and thrill of soccer in a player centered environment. The main focus is on FUN and DEVELOPMENT with age appropriate training and coaching where…

Recreation & Sports
4
Oregon Girls Lacrosse Association

Oregon girls lacrosse association is responsible for managing league/statewide policies, scheduling and organizing league activities to ensure a safe and fair environment, and promoting the spirit and sportsmanship of the game of lacrosse…

Recreation & Sports
5
Eastside Portland Lacrosse

providing lacrosse education and league for youth 1st grade through 8th grade

Human Services
6
Lincoln Youth Soccer

Lincoln Youth Soccer is a community soccer club offering recreational, developmental and competitive opportunities to youth from elementary schools, middle schools and neighboring communities around Lincoln High School, located in…

Recreation & Sports
7
West Linn Softball Association

Our organization provides administration for girls youth softball programs in West Linn, OR for approximately 300 players.

Recreation & Sports
8
Oregon City Youth Football Assoc

Oregon City Youth Football Assoc. was established to provide organized flag and tackle football to kids in the elementary grades.

Recreation & Sports
9
Lincoln Lacrosse Club

Youth and High School Sport Club in Portland Oregon. The club is run by volunteer parents for a sport that is not supported by the school district or state.

Recreation & Sports
10
Columbia Lacrosse Club Inc

Promote and organize youth sports

Recreation & Sports
11
Chehalem Valley Soccer Club

To promote, develop, and administer the game of soccer amoung youth (boys and girls under 19 years of age), residing within the Chehalem Valley and surrounding areads, and to promote amateur soccer competition for these youth.

Recreation & Sports
12
Lower Columbia Youth Soccer Assoc

Provide youth soccer programs

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clackamas Junior Baseball Association; the most unlike its peers is Clackamas Youth Lacrosse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLACKAMAS HIGH SCHOOL: $35,359 · OtherCLACKAMAS HIGH SCHOOLADRIENNE C NELSON HIGH SCHOOL: $29,046 · OtherADRIENNE C NELSON HIGH SCHOOLMILWAUKIE HIGH SCHOOL PTSA: $7,295 · OtherMILWAUKIE HIGH SCHOOL PTSA+49 more: $44,325 · Other+49 moreCLACKAMAS YOUTH FOOTBALL: $5,130 · Youth DevelopmentCLACKAMAS JUNIOR BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $2,585 · Recreation & SportsGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 · PhilanthropyEASTSIDE TIMBERS: $500 · Human ServicesLinfield University: $353 · EducationTROUT CREEK BIBLE CAMP INC: $340 · ReligionOREGON MUSIC EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $265 · Arts & Culture
Other$116,025Youth Development$5,130Recreation & Sports$2,585Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$500Education$353Religion$340Arts & Culture$265

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLACKAMAS YOUTH FOOTBALL: $5,130 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetZMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEASTSIDE TIMBERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLACKAMAS YOUTH LACROSSE INC: $440 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLinfield University: $353 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON MUSIC EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANCOUVER GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKIE HIGH SCHOOL PTSA ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS YOUTH FOOTBALL ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS JUNIOR BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds ZMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE TIMBERS ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS YOUTH LACROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds TROUT CREEK BIBLE CAMP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010 Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010 Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Linfield University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010 Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sam Elkins Memorial Fund Founded in Mem Ory of Samuel Isaac Elkins1991-2010’s filings →

More from the funding graph