Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam & Roslyn Berkman Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$685kArts & Culture$90kCrime & Legal$31kPhilanthropy$30kHealth$3kReligion$2kYouth Development$2k
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$11,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Oregon Foundation$100,000
Enough Abuse$20,000
The Threepenny Review$11,000
Jewish Federation$5,000
Oak Hill School$2,000
The Forward Association$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Enough Abuse: $20k → 16%The Threepenny Review: $11k → 10%Stephen S Wise Temple: $2k → 14%The New Criterion: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $6k → 15%Sarcoma Foundation of America: $2k → 8%Massachusetts Citizens for Children: $8k → 16%The Threepenny Review: $3k → 10%UCLA Foundation: $72k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $6k → 15%Sarcoma Foundation of America: $1k → 8%Massachusetts Citizens for Children: $3k → 16%The Threepenny Review: $3k → 10%UCLA Foundation: $65k → 14%The New Criterion: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $5k → 15%The Threepenny Review: $3k → 10%UCLA Foundation: $60k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $5k → 15%The Threepenny Review: $1k → 10%UCLA Foundation: $53k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $5k → 15%The Threepenny Review: $1k → 10%Jewish Federation: $5k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%Oak Hill School: $2k → 15%The Threepenny Review: $1k → 10%Jewish Federation: $5k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%University of Oregon Foundation: $100k → 15%Jewish Federation: $5k → 14%Foundation For Cultural Review: $5k → 17%University of Oregon Foundation: $100k → 15%Jewish Federation: $5k → 14%University of Oregon Foundation: $50k → 15%Jewish Federation: $5k → 14%University of Oregon Foundation: $50k → 15%LACMA Museum Associates: $5k → 14%University of Oregon Foundation: $50k → 15%LACMA Museum Associates: $5k → 14%University of Oregon Foundation: $50k → 15%LACMA Museum Associates: $5k → 14%Vivian Olum Child Development Cente: $6k → 15%LACMA Museum Associates: $5k → 14%LACMA Museum Associates: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$577k · 9 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$577k
$15k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2021–2026 · $400k · revenue +113%
  • EA
    ENOUGH ABUSE INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $31k · revenue +34%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW
    6× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • VO
    Vivian Olum Child Development Cente
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • UJ
    United Jewish Fund Greater Los Ange
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SS
    STEPHEN S WISE TEMPLE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Aura provides innovative, open resources to enable discovery and excellence in research, to unify the astrophysics communities, and to promote public understanding of our universe and the benefits of scientific exploration.

Science & Tech
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
University of Arizona Foundation

The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.

Education
12
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Oak Hill School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONUCLA FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONENOUGH ABUSE INC: $31,000 · OtherENOUGH ABUSE INCOAK HILL SCHOOL: $29,000 · OtherOAK HILL SCHOOLLACMA Museum Associates: $25,000 · OtherLACMA Museum Associat…Jewish Federation: $25,000 · OtherJewish FederationTHREEPENNY REVIEW: $24,000 · OtherTHREEPENNY REVIEWIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…Vivian Olum Child Development Cente: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $8,500 · Other+3 moreFOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$650,000Other$158,500Arts & Culture$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENOUGH ABUSE INC: $31,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOAK HILL SCHOOL: $29,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHREEPENNY REVIEW: $24,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENOUGH ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW ↗
  • Who funds OAK HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THREEPENNY REVIEW ↗
  • Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds The Forward Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam & Roslyn Berkman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam & Roslyn Berkman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam & Roslyn Berkman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph