Skip to content

· Private foundation

Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
4
’20
1
’21
2
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MRecreation & Sports$200kFood & Nutrition$90kInternational$20kHuman Services$1k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNICEF: $10k → 17%OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $100k → 9%MIAMI ISD: $125k → 10%CANADIAN ISD: $125k → 11%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $30k → 17%SNACK PACK 4 KIDS: $20k → 20%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%VALLEY SETTLEMENT: $30k → 8%FOOD BANK OFTHE ROCKIES: $30k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $125k → 13%THE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $100k → 9%MIAMI ISD: $50k → 10%CANADIAN ISD: $50k → 11%HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $10k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+10%

Still filing today

25%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22
Food & NutritionInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LELAND STANFORD JUNIRO UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $500k
  • TO
    THE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +46%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $175k

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +10%
  • VS
    VALLEY SETTLEMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
2
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
6
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
12
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LELAND STANFORD JUNIRO UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · OtherLELAND STANFORD JUNIRO UNIVERSITYTHE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $200,000 · OtherTHE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INCIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $31,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $200,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacVALLEY SETTLEMENT: $30,000 · EducationVALLEY SETTLEMENTFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 · International
Other$1,081,000Education$530,000Food & Nutrition$60,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $200,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Salem and Ruth Ann Abraham’s filings →

More from the funding graph