Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Saint Anne of Winona

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. We witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we serve to live well and with purpose, with special concern for the underserved.

$940k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$902k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$51,612
Largest grant, FY2025
$798,854
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$27M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Saint Anne of Winona funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$902k33%
FY20232$271k0%
FY20223$268k67%
FY20211$158k0%
FY20201$142k0%
FY20191$53k0%
FY20181$91k0%
FY20171$91kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MHealth$760k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Benedictine Health System$1,572,71191%
Benedictine Living Communities Inc$320,24840%
Benedictine Foundation$72,78012%
Regina Senior Living$10,6041n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Benedictine Health SystemMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Benedictine Health System · Benedictine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Saint Anne of Winona with peer funders

About Saint Anne of Winona

How much does Saint Anne of Winona give?
Saint Anne of Winona reported 4 itemized grants totaling $901,970, out of $939,928 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Saint Anne of Winona fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (62%), Health (38%).
Who are Saint Anne of Winona's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Benedictine Health System ($1.6M), Benedictine Living Communities Inc ($320k), Benedictine Foundation ($73k).
Does Saint Anne of Winona fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Saint Anne of Winona?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Benedictine Health System, Benedictine Foundation.
Where is Saint Anne of Winona based?
Saint Anne of Winona is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saint Anne of Winona’s filings →

More from the funding graph