Loading…
· Public charity
SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC
To provide financial support for the needy children and adult residents of martin county, florida and employees of sailfish point poa so as to enable them to enjoy more successful and happy lives.
$410k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants
2
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2021.
Education$260kYouth Development$226kHealth$47kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$31k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
sailingscholarships
2020
carepotentialscholarships
2021
researchcancer
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2021 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $2k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- PROJECT LIFT INC$30,000
- CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,825
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$541k · 6 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +226% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
6
Total granted
$541k
$42k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+226%
+15%
Still filing today
83%
83%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPROJECT LIFT INC3× · 2019–2021 · $170k · revenue +466%
- IRINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE - FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $165k · revenue +226%
- HRHOPE RURAL SCHOOL3× · 2018–2020 · $85k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- DEDUNBAR EARLY LEARNING CENTERone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -78%
- TATHE ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +15%
- GWGERTRUDE WALDEN CHILD CARE CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Turtle Island Children's Center Inc
Our mission is to foster and sustain a thriving community of care and education while elevating the voices of children and early childhood educators. this is a respectful partnership between children, teachers, families, the larger…
Human Services
2
Child Study Center
The center provides children with complex developmental & behavioral disabilities the highest quality diagnosis, treatment and education to help them achieve their full potential.
Education
3
United States Sailing Center of Martin
Us sailing center of martin county, inc is committed to broadening the base of the sport of sailing through dedicated, affordable, community sailing programs for youth and adults, and providing support for the development of future…
Recreation & Sports
4
The Arc of St Lucie County
To empower children and adults with developmental disabilities to achieve their fullest potential.
—
5
Childrens Discovery Center
The Discovery Center serves as a resource for the children of Hawaii.
Arts & Culture
6
Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care
—
7
Ccri Inc
CCRI supports children, adults, and families touched by a disability. We inspire people to reach their full potential and we do not let a disability define who a person is. Our mission is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of…
—
8
Marin General Hospital
To provide exceptional health care services in a compassionate and healing environment.
Health
9
Upper Peninsula Children's Museum
The upper peninsula children's museum's mission is to empower youth and families to explore, create, and learn together through inclusive, child- designed exhibits that foster community connection and discovery.
Arts & Culture
10
The Childrens Center
The children's center provides early child care and education in a vibrant learning community that emphasizes personal development, social relationships and family involvement, in order to establish a foundation for lifelong learning.
Education
11
Martin Pitt Partnership for Children Inc
To provide every child in Martin and Pitt counties between the ages of birth to five the opportunity to experience a quality early childhood education.
Education
12
Marin Community Clinic
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Martin County and the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$260,000Youth Development$226,000Health$46,825Other$31,120Human Services$11,000Arts & Culture$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE - FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MARTIN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds US SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DUNBAR EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GERTRUDE WALDEN CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HFTP HEADQUARTERS ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation -FL20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - · Community Foundation for Palm Beach And · The Lichtenberger Foundation · United Way of Martin County Inc · Hobe Sound Community Chest Inc · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROJECT LIFT INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273949112 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PROJECT LIFT INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Sailfish Point Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sailfish Point Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines