· Public charity
Sailfish Point Foundation Inc
To provide financial support for the needy children and adult residents of martin county, florida and employees of sailfish point poa so as to enable them to enjoy more sucessful and happy lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $31,825 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $410,297 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $378,472 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $2k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT LIFT INC | $30,000 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $1,825 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +226% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2020 · $219k · revenue +226%
- PLPROJECT LIFT INC3× · 2019–2021 · $170k · revenue +281%
- HRHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC4× · 2017–2020 · $110k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- TDTHE DUNBAR CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -82%
- AOARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +285%
- GWGertrude Walden Child Care Centerone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.
ICRI provides high quality education and care to children and their families, responsive and emergent to each childs unique needs and strengths.
Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…
The mission of courageous sailing is to transform children's lives through sailing programs that inspire learning, personal growth, and leadership.
The system is a not-for-profit, community-based health care organization that offers preventive, primary and acute hospital care, as well as cancer care, a heart center, wellness and rehabilitation services, and much more. Our services…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To provide exceptional health care, hope and compassion to every person, every time.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Lincoln-marti charter schools, inc. is a non-profit florida corporation, organized to provide high quality educational choices to south florida families.
To provide better care of the sick, investigation into their problems and further education of those who serve. The primary mission is to provide quality health care services to the citizens of Martin and Southern St. Lucie Counties…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Martin County and the most unlike its peers is Us Sailing Foundation of Martin County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Martin Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds US SAILING FOUNDATION OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE DUNBAR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds Gertrude Walden Child Care Center ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Museum of the Treasure Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNA'L ASSOC OF HOSPITALITY ACCOUNTAN DBA HOSPITALITY FINANCIAL & TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sailfish Point Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.