Skip to content

· Public charity

Safe Streets Safe Communities

To promote public policies aimed at keeping safe and strong communities across the United States

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Benefit$6.5MEnvironment$1.6MCivil Rights$1.3MCommunity Improvement$250kScience & Tech$200kAnimals$46k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $469k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Americans for Citizen Voting$300,000
Keystone Renewal PAC$250,000
Security is Stength LLC$200,000
True Patriot PAC$94,000
Kentucky Conserv Alliance$75,000
Oklahoma Conservative Renewal$50,000
Hometown Freedom Action Net$50,000
The Wonderdog PAC$46,000
United for Clean Power$25,000
LA Leadership Fund$21,000
Good Government Alliance$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Leadership Action Fund: $3.0M → 10%Keystone Renewal PAC: $250k → 11%Okla Conservative Alliance: $1.8M → 11%Security is Stength LLC: $200k → 14%A Public Voice: $750k → 16%Prosperity Alliance: $250k → 6%One Nation Inc: $300k → 7%Reboot Louisiana: $250k → 10%Delta Good Hand PAC: $425k → 19%United for Clean Power: $1.4M → 11%Bluegrass Freedom Action: $185k → 10%Kentucky Conserv Alliance: $75k → 15%Oklahoma Conservative Renewal: $50k → 6%Americans for Citizen Voting: $300k → 7%United for Clean Power: $40k → 11%Good Government Alliance: $10k → 6%United for Clean Power: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Leadership Action Fund: $2,990,000 · OtherLeadership Action FundOkla Conservative Alliance: $1,758,000 · OtherOkla Conservative AllianceDelta Good Hand PAC: $425,000 · OtherDelta Good Hand PACDefend US PAC: $400,000 · OtherDefend US PACLIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND: $300,000 · OtherKeystone Renewal PAC: $250,000 · OtherReboot Louisiana: $250,000 · Other+9 more: $731,000 · Other+9 moreUnited for Clean Power: $1,515,000 · EnvironmentUnited for Clean …A PUBLIC VOICE INC: $750,000 · Public BenefitA PUBLIC VOICE…ONE NATION: $300,000 · Public BenefitONE NATIONProsperity Alliance Inc: $250,000 · Public BenefitProsperity All…
Other$7,104,000Environment$1,515,000Public Benefit$1,300,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited for Clean Power: $1,515,000 over 3y, 81% of budgetA PUBLIC VOICE INC: $750,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetONE NATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND: $300,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetProsperity Alliance Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United for Clean Power ↗
  • Who funds A PUBLIC VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE NATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Prosperity Alliance Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American AdvancementMD22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Advancement · American Policy Coalition · American Jobs and Growth Fund · American Exceptionalism Institute · Prosperity Alliance Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Safe Streets Safe Communities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Safe Streets Safe Communities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Safe Streets Safe Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph