· Public charity
American Policy Coalition
With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $262k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bluegrass Freedom Action | $530,000 |
| American Jobs and Security | $462,236 |
| American Exceptionalism | $420,000 |
| Protect OH WorkFamily | $325,000 |
| A Strong Oklahoma Inc | $117,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $94,500 |
| American United for Values | $50,000 |
| Strong Oklahoma Fund LLC | $40,000 |
| Northwest Ohio Freedom PAC | $35,000 |
| A Public Voice | $25,000 |
| American Manuf Alliance | $21,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +273% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WTWINNING THE ISSUES2× · 2022–2023 · $600k · revenue +273% · 100% of their budget
- AJAmerican Jobs and Security2× · 2023–2024 · $562k · revenue ×30 · 30% of their budget
- APA PUBLIC VOICE INC2× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue ×17 · 43% of their budget
Funded once
- SSSOONER STATE LEADERSHIP FUNDone grant, 2022 · $900k
- AJAmerican Jobs and Growthone grant, 2022 · $850k
- POProtect our Constitutionone grant, 2023 · $800k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.
American Jobs and Growth Fund aims to advances policies to change the long-term fiscal trajectory of the United States through responsible spending policies.
Prosperity Alliance is committed to building a stronger economy for all Americans through enacting pro-growth economic policies.
To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.
Economic Future Fund aims to build a stronger, more vibrant economy for the American people through innovative public policies and free market solutions.
United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.
21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.
American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.
To promote sound economic policy: 1 By engaging in citizen led initiative and referendum efforts, 2 By participating in the public policy arena, and 3 By providing educational services to the general public.
American Voice's mission is to create a more prosperous, fair and free
To promote the common good and general welfare through education and legislative participation on public matters that significantly impact the economy, job growth and retention, employment and that are designed to promote fiscal…
It is the mission of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) to provide education, research, analysis and recommendations to policy makers, opinion leaders and the American people designed to help solve public policy problems through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Advancement and the most unlike its peers is Winning the Issues. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WINNING THE ISSUES ↗
- Who funds American Jobs and Security ↗
- Who funds American Exceptionalism Institute ↗
- Who funds Safe Streets Safe Communities ↗
- Who funds American Advancement ↗
- Who funds ONE NATION ↗
- Who funds Independence and Freedom Network ↗
- Who funds The Revitalization Project ↗
- Who funds A PUBLIC VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds A Strong Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds American Principles Project ↗
- Who funds Defend US Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Advancement · Prosperity Alliance Inc · A Public Voice Inc · American Exceptionalism Institute · The Revitalization Project · American Jobs and Growth Fund · American Jobs and Security · Government Integrity Fund · Citizens for a Working America Inc · Safe Streets Safe Communities · Defend US Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Policy Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.