Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sacramento Samaritans

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$212kYouth Development$88kInternational$70kCrime & Legal$45kHealth$38kReligion$36kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,302
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO$18,500
KIDS'S INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT$7,500
CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT$7,500
THE WORSHIP CENTER$6,302
SERVICEHEART - CASA$5,000
CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES$5,000
HOPE OF THE WORLD$5,000
ZIA THERAPY INC$5,000
INNERLIFE MINISTRIES$2,500
TOBY WRIGHT SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $21k → 14%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT: $10k → 17%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $20k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $15k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $10k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $8k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $8k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $8k → 14%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT: $10k → 20%HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT: $6k → 14%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $10k → 20%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT: $8k → 20%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT: $8k → 20%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $8k → 20%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $6k → 20%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT I: $6k → 20%CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT: $5k → 20%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $5k → 20%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $3k → 20%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$487k · 13 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$487k
$17k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +40%
  • CO
    CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +85%
  • KI
    KIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SP
    SURGE PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CF
    CHANUKAH FOR IDF SOLDIERS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Otero County Economic Development Council
—
2
Angels of Love

To provide victims of domestic violence of the rio grande valley with individualized services in a safe and loving environment in order to provide them with the tools necessary to restore each woman and child to a healthy self-worth and…

Human Services
3
Crisis Center of Northern New Mexico

Provide a safe haven (shelter) for persons who have experienced physical, sexual, psychological violence or a combination thereof, color,or sexual orientation without prejudice regarding age, ethnicity,creed,gender or nationalty.

—
4
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
5
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
6
Otro Enfoque Inc
International
7
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
8
Sheris House of Hope Inc

Spread awareness and prevention of domestic violence and to provide education and give hope to domestic violence victims and their children

Crime & Legal
9
New Mexico Child First Network Inc

The purpose of the new mexico child first network is to support children and their caretakers in the new mexico child protective services care and custody. the primary goal is to provide support and training to caregivers and children in…

Human Services
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health
11
Children's Grief Center of Nm

To provide compassionate and safe support, understanding, healing, and hope to the grieving community.

Human Services
12
Oficiales Investigadores De Cruelda
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart Gallery of New Mexico Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO: $88,250 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OTEROFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE: $70,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSEZIA THERAPY INC: $36,250 · OtherZIA THERAPY INCSERVICEHEART - CASA: $32,500 · OtherSERVICEHEART - CASAINNERLIFE MINISTRIES: $12,500 · OtherHOPE OF THE WORLD: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $34,776 · Other+8 moreHEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $94,992 · Human ServicesHEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATIONCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $46,250 · Human ServicesCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INCCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC: $33,750 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INCKIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $44,500 · Crime & LegalKIDS INC C…
Other$284,276Human Services$174,992Crime & Legal$44,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $94,992 over 8y, 10% of budgetCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $46,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetKIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $44,500 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC: $33,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE OF THE WORLD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sacramento Samaritans funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sacramento Samaritans. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sacramento Samaritans?

    Find your warmest path to Sacramento Samaritans through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sacramento Samaritans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph