· Private foundation
S&G Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of S&G FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k18 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $402k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $676k
- $250k+12 grants · $124M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 200,000 shares of Vanguard Index Fds | $44,586,000 |
| Fidelity Charitable Donor Advised Fund - 14,500,000 shares of United States Treas. Bill | $14,390,830 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund | $11,800,000 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 34,000 shares of AON PLC | $11,256,407 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 264,400 shares of Davis Fundamental ETF TR Select US Eqty | $8,820,384 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 264,400 shares of Davis Fundamental ETF TR Select Wrld WI | $7,587,950 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 40,000 shares of Progressive Corp | $6,366,800 |
| Fidelity Charitable Donor Advised Fund - 6,200,000 shares of United States Treas. Bill | $6,159,468 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 40,000 shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. | $6,088,000 |
| Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund - 15,000 shares of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | $5,389,726 |
| Princeton Prospect Foundation | $1,498,352 |
| Emma Willard School | $375,000 |
| Lake Forest College | $140,000 |
| University of Florida | $112,500 |
| Case Western Reserve University | $100,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +134% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MGMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +243%
- TBTHE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC2× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +43%
Maine Coast Heritage Trust2× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +95%
- LMLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +67%
- BHBar Harbor Music Festival Corporationone grant, 2020 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…
See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…
Chartered in 1826, lafayette college is dedicated to excellence in undergraduate education. students are engaged in a transformative educational experience that bridges the liberal arts, engineering, and interdisciplinary study. the…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bennington College Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds METHODIST UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ethel D Colket Foundation · Fore River Foundation · Colket Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Curtis & Patricia Blake Foundation · Donald Grant & Ann Martin Calder Foundat · Legatus Foundation · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The David and Elizabeth Long Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to S&G Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to S&G Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.