Skip to content
S&R Kleiman Foundation Inc %Mutino & Chan Cpa LLP at a glance

· Private foundation

S&R Kleiman Foundation Inc %Mutino & Chan Cpa LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$629kHealth$306kReligion$172kPublic Safety & Disaster$54kInternational$50kHuman Services$1kEducation$25Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$42,000
ACSZ$30,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF SCARSDALE$18,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN$15,000
CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON$10,000
JBI INTERNATIONAL$6,000
YESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM$5,400
AMIT$5,000
MOUNT SINAI DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH FUND$5,000
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$2,500
MET MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
AM MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY$575
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+44%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $591k · revenue +274%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $138k · revenue +61%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $82k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMER COMM SHAARE ZEDEK
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CO
    CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +120%
  • ZA
    ZICHRON AVROHOM YOSEF
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Chesed Aharon
Philanthropy
6
Aishel Hatzedek
International
7
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
11
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Committee for Shaare Zedek Hospital in Jerusalem Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zichron Avrohom Yosef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $591,200 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC+3 more: $24,650 · Arts & CultureAMER COMM SHAARE ZEDEK: $50,000 · OtherAMER COMM SHAARE …MOUNT SINAI DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH FUND: $40,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI DERMA…CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON: $34,400 · OtherCHABAD OF BINGHAM…ACSZ: $30,000 · OtherACSZNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $19,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL …MET MUSEUM OF ART: $12,500 · OtherMET MUSEUM OF ART+4 more: $11,125 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $138,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTE…AMIT CHILDREN INC: $44,800 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INC+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $82,200 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF …West Side Hatzoloh: $54,000 · HealthWest Side Hatzol…JBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $41,100 · HealthJBI INTERNATIONA…YESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM INC: $43,300 · ReligionCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · ReligionZICHRON AVROHOM YOSEF: $10,000 · PhilanthropyDOROT INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$615,850Other$197,025International$187,800Health$177,300Religion$53,300Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $591,200 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $138,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $82,200 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $54,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $44,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM INC: $43,300 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $41,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON AVROHOM YOSEF: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH HISTORY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds West Side Hatzoloh ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds JBI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON AVROHOM YOSEF ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR JEWISH HISTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization S&R Kleiman Foundation Inc %Mutino & Chan Cpa LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S&R Kleiman Foundation Inc %Mutino & Chan Cpa LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on S&R Kleiman Foundation Inc %Mutino & Chan Cpa LLP’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home