Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rural Advancement Foundation Internation

Rafi challenges the root causes of unjust food systems, supporting and advocating for economically, racially and ecologically just farms communities.

$870k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 28 grants below total $530,155 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $869,927 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $339,772 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $272k
$8,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE$120,036
VIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION INC$101,292
WINROCK INTL INST FOR AG DEV$50,571
NATIONAL ASSOC OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS$38,203
FOUNTAIN HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE LLC$26,315
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$25,625
GREEN HEFFA FARMS INC$14,494
HENSON'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
SPRUCE PINE UMC$10,000
RIDGEVILLE OKRA CO$9,581
RED TAIL GRAINS LLC$8,500
GRAIN BIN FARMS$8,500
MOUSAVI FARM$8,500
SC BLACK FARMERS COALITION FOUNDATION$8,500
SUNLIGHT FARM LLC$8,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 89% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($234k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IA
CA
KY
VA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Beyond the US — 11% of all-years giving ($234k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$178k · 2 grants
US Virgin Islands$57k · 2 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$907k · 18 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +627% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
104

Total granted

$907k
$843k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+627%
+52%

Still filing today

17%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $358k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $205k · revenue +627% · 36% of their budget
  • HM
    HISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue ×17
  • FD
    FEAST DOWN EAST INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +32%
  • NC
    North Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projecgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +53%
  • Communities In Partnershipgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +328%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uptown Farmers Market

Our mission is to engage our neighbors around locally grown, fresh foods to support local farmers and food artisans, educate on healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity in our charlotte community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Hub City Roots

The hub city farmers' market is a nonprofit community organization that aims to increase supply, demand, and access to healthy, local foods in spartanburg, south carolina.

Food & Nutrition
3
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
4
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
5
Nc Farm Bureau Legal Foundation Inc
6
Winston County Self Help Cooperative

Help small farmers purchase and sell in bulk with a goal of creating sustainability in rural communities by connecting with usda and other organizations to provide services in a timely manner.

Food & Nutrition
7
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
8
Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project

To help local farms thrive, link farmers to markets and supporters, and build healthy communities through connections to local food.

Environment
9
Northwest Farms to Families

The NWF2F DBA Minority Growers Collective is a 501(c)3 charitable nonprofit founded in February of 2021 to meet the education, training, and financial assistance needs of agricultural growers and producers of color and meet the needs of…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit
Philanthropy
11
Gorge Grown Food Network

To build access to locally grown food and support local farmers.

Food & Nutrition
12
Sustainable Growers

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Ga Project for Community Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piedmont Progressive Farmers Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARRBORO FARMERS MARKET — $152,948 · OtherCARRBORO FARMERS MARKETDURHAM FARMERS MARKET — $147,020 · OtherDURHAM FARMERS MARKETDURHAM CENTRAL MARKET INC — $56,400 · OtherFountain Heights Cooperative LLC — $56,155 · Other+128 more — $1,174,577 · Other+128 moreALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP — $205,315 · Food & NutritionALLIANCE FOR…FEAST DOWN EAST INC — $15,269 · Food & NutritionFEAST DOWN E…FARMER FOODSHARE INC — $8,327 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $14,300 · Food & Nutrition+2 moreVIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION — $101,292 · Human ServicesFARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC — $38,203 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $25,625 · Community ImprovementCommunities In Partnership — $15,400 · Community ImprovementCarolina Common Enterprise — $8,000 · Community ImprovementST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $59,007 · PhilanthropyWINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT — $50,571 · InternationalNATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY — $28,609 · Environment
Other$1,587,100Food & Nutrition$243,211Human Services$111,292Community Improvement$87,228Philanthropy$59,007International$50,571Environment$28,609

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP — $205,315 over 3y, 36% of budgetVIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION — $101,292 over 1y, 12% of budgetST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $59,007 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT — $50,571 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC — $38,203 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY — $28,609 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $25,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec — $24,533 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC — $24,292 over 3y, 11% of budgetCommunities In Partnership — $15,400 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFEAST DOWN EAST INC — $15,269 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBENEVOLENCE FARM — $9,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFARMER FOODSHARE INC — $8,327 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMETRO ATLANTA URBAN FARM — $8,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCarolina Common Enterprise — $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC — $7,950 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEDENTON FARMERS MARKET — $6,300 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP
  • Who funds VIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION
  • Who funds ST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC
  • Who funds North Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec
  • Who funds HISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC
  • Who funds Communities In Partnership
  • Who funds FEAST DOWN EAST INC
  • Who funds PIEDMONT PROGRESSIVE FARMERS GROUP
  • Who funds FARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit CorporationVA30.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Farmer Foodshare Inc · Inquiring Systems Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Nc Idea · Windward Fund · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rural Advancement Foundation Internation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rural Advancement Foundation Internation?

    Find your warmest path to Rural Advancement Foundation Internation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph