Skip to content

· Public charity

Rural Advancement Foundation Internation

Rafi challenges the root causes of unjust food systems, supporting and advocating for economically, racially and ecologically just farm communities.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$245k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MEnvironment$142kPhilanthropy$59kCommunity Improvement$54kHousing & Shelter$9kEducation$9k
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 43 grants below total $820,065, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,211,070 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $391,005 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $109k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $360k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $352k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE$245,085
VIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION INC$106,639
GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$44,107
LA COSECHA CSA$32,456
FITICAS EL FIDEICOMISO DE TIERRAS COMUNITARIAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA SOSTENIB$26,558
FARMER VETERAN COALITION$23,178
FUNDACION BUCARABON INC$22,500
FOUNTAIN HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE LLC$22,015
MUSE 3 FARM LLC$21,780
WINROCK INTL INST FOR AG DEV$16,352
FLORIDA CERTIFIED ORGANIC GROWERS$10,768
NORTH FORK FARM$10,000
BELL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
ROUND MOUNTAIN CREAMERY$10,000
WENCESLAUS PROVOST JR FARM LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($234k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LA COSECHA CSA: $32k → 14%FARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IA
CA
KY
VA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($234k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$178k · 2 grants
US Virgin Islands$57k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 21 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
124

Total granted

$1.5M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+33%

Still filing today

24%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $450k · revenue +627% · 36% of their budget
  • HM
    HISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue ×17
  • FD
    FEAST DOWN EAST INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $38k · revenue +6%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +32%
  • IS
    INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uptown Farmers Market

Our mission is to engage our neighbors around locally grown, fresh foods to support local farmers and food artisans, educate on healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity in our charlotte community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Rural Advancement Foundation Internation

Rafi challenges the root causes of unjust food systems, supporting and advocating for economically, racially and ecologically just farm communities.

International
3
The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit
Philanthropy
4
Sustainable Growers
—
5
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
7
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
8
Gorge Grown Food Network

To build access to locally grown food and support local farmers.

Food & Nutrition
9
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
10
Hub City Roots

The hub city farmers' market is a nonprofit community organization that aims to increase supply, demand, and access to healthy, local foods in spartanburg, south carolina.

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Food Connections Inc

Support small farms and other businesses. Bring sustainable healthy products to the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Ga Project for Community Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fundacion Bucarabon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARRBORO FARMERS MARKET: $152,948 · OtherCARRBORO FARMERS MARKETDURHAM FARMERS MARKET: $147,020 · OtherDURHAM FARMERS MARKETFountain Heights Cooperative LLC: $78,170 · Other+159 more: $1,501,384 · Other+159 moreALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP: $450,400 · Food & NutritionALLIANCE FOR AGRICUL…FIDEICOMISO DE TIERRAS COMUNITARIAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE: $26,558 · Food & NutritionFARMER VETERAN COALITION: $23,178 · Food & Nutrition+5 more: $48,664 · Food & Nutrition+5 moreVIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION: $207,931 · Human ServicesVIRGIN IS…LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $32,456 · Human ServicesLA COSECH…FARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC: $38,203 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $25,625 · Community ImprovementFUNDACION BUCARABON INC: $22,500 · Community ImprovementCommunities In Partnership: $15,400 · Community ImprovementCarolina Common Enterprise: $8,000 · Community ImprovementST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $59,007 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $44,107 · PhilanthropyWINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT: $66,923 · InternationalNATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY: $28,609 · Environment
Other$1,879,522Food & Nutrition$548,800Human Services$250,387Community Improvement$109,728Philanthropy$103,114International$66,923Environment$28,609

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP: $450,400 over 4y, 36% of budgetVIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION: $207,931 over 2y, 12% of budgetWINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT: $66,923 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $59,007 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC: $38,203 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY: $28,609 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $25,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec: $24,533 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC: $24,292 over 3y, 11% of budgetCommunities In Partnership: $15,400 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFEAST DOWN EAST INC: $15,269 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFLORIDA CERTIFIED ORGANIC GROWERS AND CONSUMERS INC: $10,768 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBENEVOLENCE FARM: $9,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFARMER FOODSHARE INC: $8,327 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCarolina Common Enterprise: $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMETRO ATLANTA URBAN FARM: $8,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC: $7,950 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEDENTON FARMERS MARKET: $6,300 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURE CORP ↗
  • Who funds VIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds FIDEICOMISO DE TIERRAS COMUNITARIAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE ↗
  • Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds North Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC MORGANTON FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMER VETERAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FUNDACION BUCARABON INC ↗
  • Who funds Communities In Partnership ↗
  • Who funds FEAST DOWN EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA CERTIFIED ORGANIC GROWERS AND CONSUMERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMWORKERS SELF-HELP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit CorporationVA30.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Farmer Foodshare Inc · Inquiring Systems Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Nc Idea · Windward Fund · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rural Advancement Foundation Internation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rural Advancement Foundation Internation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rural Advancement Foundation Internation?

    Find your warmest path to Rural Advancement Foundation Internation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 182 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rural Advancement Foundation Internation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph