Skip to content

· Private foundation

Runnymeade Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$284kHuman Services$87kCivil Rights$86kHousing & Shelter$31kFood & Nutrition$28kArts & Culture$16kAnimals$9kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Baruch College Fund$40,000
College of Staten Island LGBTQ Center$6,000
The Lesbian Gay and Bisexual & Transgender Community Center$5,000
Oklahomans for Equality$5,000
Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE)$5,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$3,000
STREETCATS INC$3,000
Gods Love We Deliver$3,000
St Jude Childrens Research$3,000
QSpot LGBT Community Center$3,000
Bergen County Horse Rescue$2,000
LHEF Inc$1,000
FORL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Spencer Pride Inc: $6k → 14%Spencer Pride Inc: $6k → 14%Spencer Pride Inc: $4k → 14%The Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Community Center: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$505k · 19 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$505k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+49%

Still filing today

42%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +158%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • LA
    Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • TL
    The Lesbian Gay and Bisexual & Transgender Community Center YES Program
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • YP
    YES PROGRAM NYC Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Community Center
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brooklyn Community Pride Center Inc

Brooklyn community pride center uplifts and empowers lgbtq+ brooklynites through socially conscious and culturally responsive programs, partnerships and advocacy.

Civil Rights
2
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
3
Lgbt Life Center

Lgbt life center is a trusted leader that empowers the lgbtq communities and all people affected by hiv through improving health and wellness, strengthening families and communities, and providing transformative education and advocacy.

Health
4
Pride Center of Staten Island Inc

To enhance and sustain the well-being of the lgbtqia+ and allied communities by providing programs and services that cultivate community; advocate for lgbtqia+ interests; educate and empower, and provide social support.

Civil Rights
5
Los Angeles Lgbt Center

Building a world where lgbt people thrive as healthy, equal and complete members of society. since its inception, the los angeles lgbt center (center) has been building a world where lgbt people thrive as healthy, equal and complete…

—
6
Bridging Access to Care Inc

Bridging access to care, inc. provides coordinated healthcare and supportive services to help individuals, families and communities build strength and resilience, achieve wellness and live healthy, productive lives.

Health
7
Services and Advocacy for Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Transgender Elders Inc

Services and advocacy for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender elders, inc. (sage) is the country's largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of lgbtq+ older adults. in partnership with our constituents and…

—
8
Housing Works Inc

Housing works is a vibrant, healing community of people living with and affected by hiv/aids. our mission is to end the dual crises of homelessness and aids through relentless advocacy, the provision of lifesaving services, and…

Community Improvement
9
Nytag Inc New York Transgender Advocacy Group

Nytag advocates for more inclusive gender-based policies that benefit transgender and gender non-conforming/non-binary (tgncnb) individuals through building community leaders,educating practitioners, and influencing policy makers.

Civil Rights
10
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
11
The Audre Lorde Project Inc

The audre lorde project, inc. alp is a lesbian, gay, bisexual, two spirit, trans and gender non-conforming people of color community organizing center, focusing on the new york city area. through mobilization, education, and…

Health
12
Glaad Inc

Founded forty years ago, glaad is the world's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer ("lgbtq") media advocacy organization promoting and ensuring fair, accurate, and inclusive representation of people and issues across all…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahomans for Equality Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bergen County Horse Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARUCH COLLEGE FUND LGBT STUDENTS: $79,000 · OtherBARUCH COLLEGE FUND LGBT STUDENTSOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $47,000 · OtherOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INCCollege of Staten Island LGBTQ Center: $41,000 · OtherCollege of Staten Island LGBTQ CenterServices and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE): $33,000 · OtherServices and Advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE)The Lesbian Gay and Bisexual & Transgender Community Center: $20,000 · OtherThe Lesbian Gay and Bisexual & Transgender Community CenterBIG APPLE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $16,000 · OtherThe Lesbian Gay and Bisexual & Transgender Community: $13,000 · Other+22 more: $72,500 · Other+22 moreTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $146,000 · EducationTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND+1 more: $3,000 · EducationALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $28,000 · Food & NutritionSPENCER PRIDE: $16,000 · Human ServicesLesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesSTREETCATS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC: $4,000 · Animals
Other$321,500Education$149,000Housing & Shelter$31,000Food & Nutrition$28,000Human Services$21,000Animals$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $146,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $47,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPENCER PRIDE: $16,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBIG APPLE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $16,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETCATS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPENCER PRIDE ↗
  • Who funds BIG APPLE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds STREETCATS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Runnymeade Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Runnymeade Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Runnymeade Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Runnymeade Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Runnymeade’s filings →

    More from the funding graph