Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$99kArts & Culture$79kHousing & Shelter$60kRecreation & Sports$49kEducation$39kYouth Development$34kPublic Benefit$27kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPPING STONE SHELTER$20,000
BAKERS ART CENTER$10,000
CROSSROADS CENTER$7,000
KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE$5,000
WESTERN KANSAS CAREER SHOWCASE$4,500
LIBERAL BEE JAY'S$3,500
LIBERAL AREA COALITION FOR FAMILIES$2,500
LIBERAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION$2,500
LIBERAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION$2,500
FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST$1,500
LIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$1,500
COMMUNITY BAPTIST FOOD CUPBOARD$1,500
SEWARD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$1,500
ATLETICO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $28k → 14%SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 14%KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 14%KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$356k · 21 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
25

Total granted

$356k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-6%

Still filing today

24%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BAKER ARTS CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +78%
  • SC
    SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +50%
  • KC
    KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LS
    LIBERAL SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • U4
    USD 480 SEYMOUR ROGERS
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERAL BEE JAYS: $28,100 · OtherLIBERAL BEE JAYSIndividual grant recipient: $23,780 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21,755 · OtherSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGELIBERAL KIDS INC: $20,372 · OtherLIBERAL KIDS INCIndividual grant recipient: $17,894 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIBERAL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15,163 · OtherSOUTHWEST MIRACLES INC: $14,000 · OtherLIBERAL SENIOR CENTER: $13,000 · OtherLIBERAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,293 · OtherLIBERAL AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $105,565 · Other+33 moreBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $64,750 · Arts & CultureBAKER ARTS CENTE…STEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $46,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPPING ST…SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesSEWARD COUN…KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $10,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS CHIL…LIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $9,175 · Recreation & SportsLIBERAL MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Religion
Other$292,422Arts & Culture$64,750Housing & Shelter$46,000Human Services$45,000Recreation & Sports$9,175Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $64,750 over 8y, 11% of budgetSTEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $46,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetSEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $35,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $9,175 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetSanta Fe Trail Council Boy Scouts of America Inc: $5,389 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAKER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Santa Fe Trail Council Boy Scouts of America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cooper Clark FoundationKS26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cooper Clark Foundation · Baughman Foundation · SEWARD COUNTY UNITED FUND dba SEWARD COUNTY UNITED WAY · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rundell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph