Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $39k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
6
19
6
20
6
21
6
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$709kHuman Services$133kHealth$28kHousing & Shelter$23kReligion$8k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER$25,000
PROGRESS HOUSE$5,000
FAIRBANKS HOSPITAL$3,500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$1,500
COBURN PLACE$1,000
THE JULIAN CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $31k → 16%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $25k → 16%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $25k → 16%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $22k → 16%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $21k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $2k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $2k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $1k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $1k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $1k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $1k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $1k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$192k · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down. Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$192k
$0

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $123k · revenue +68%
  • FH
    FAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $18k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    THE JULIAN CENTER INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +26%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    4/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc — $708,653 · PhilanthropyCentral Indiana Community Foundation IncST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC — $123,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S CHILD …THE JULIAN CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesProgress House — $22,500 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $8,400 · OtherFAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC — $17,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,500 · Health
    Philanthropy$708,653Human Services$133,000Other$30,900Health$28,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCentral Indiana Community Foundation Inc — $708,653 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC — $123,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetProgress House — $22,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc
    • Who funds ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC
    • Who funds Progress House
    • Who funds FAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC
    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    • Who funds THE JULIAN CENTER INC
    • Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial FoundationIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Griffith Family Foundation Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rp Dellen Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph