Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$835kEducation$398kHealth$340kYouth Development$210kScience & Tech$40kRecreation & Sports$31kArts & Culture$8kEmployment$6k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LATHAM CENTERS$60,000
SARGENT REHABILITATION CENTER$35,000
MEETING STREET CENTER$27,137
KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER$25,000
EASTER SEALS OF RHODE ISLAND$15,000
SAIL TO PREVAIL$15,000
J ARTHUR TRUDEAU MEMORIAL CENTER$12,000
BOY SCOUNTS OF AMERICA$10,000
RI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE FOGARTY CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $25k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $25k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $25k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $21k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $21k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $21k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $21k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER: $11k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%THE FOGARTY CENTER: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in RI; by stated purpose, 95%.

Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$1.9M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+60%

Still filing today

53%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LATHAM CENTERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +58%
  • SR
    SARGENT REHABILITATION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +126%
  • KC
    KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lifespan Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council Inc

Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council's mission is to promote changes wthin communities in Rhode Island that encourages, inspires and makes possible for individuals with disabilities to create, pursue and achieve lives that are…

Health
2
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
3
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
4
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
5
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
6
Kendal At Ithaca Inc

Our mission is to provide a mutually supportive environment for residents and staff, and to contribute to the greater ithaca community.

Human Services
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
9
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
10
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
11
Refocus Inc

Refocus is a human service agency that serves adults with differing physical and developmental needs. we are an organization of dedicated people offering opportunities for growth in a loving, trusting, and challenging environment. we value…

Health
12
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Fogarty Center; the most unlike its peers is Sail to Prevail. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATHAM CENTERS INC: $550,000 · OtherLATHAM CENTERS INCMEETING STREET CENTER: $302,137 · OtherMEETING STREET CENTERJ ARTHUR TRUDEAU MEMORIAL CENTER: $106,712 · OtherJ ARTHUR TRUDEAU MEMORIAL CENTERBOY SCOUNTS OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherRI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,310 · OtherNARRAGANSETT COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,000 · Other+4 more: $68,500 · Other+4 moreSARGENT REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $260,000 · EducationSARGENT REHABIL…KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC: $169,625 · Human ServicesKENNEDY-DONOVA…THE FOGARTY CENTER: $70,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOGARTY CE…EASTER SEALS RHODE ISLAND INC: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAIL TO PREVAIL: $78,000 · HealthLifespan Corporation: $10,000 · Health
Other$1,157,659Education$260,000Human Services$239,625Youth Development$120,000Health$88,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLATHAM CENTERS INC: $550,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSARGENT REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $260,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetKENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC: $169,625 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS RHODE ISLAND INC: $120,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetJ ARTHUR TRUDEAU MEMORIAL CENTER: $106,712 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAIL TO PREVAIL: $78,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FOGARTY CENTER: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNARRAGANSETT COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLifespan Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LATHAM CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SARGENT REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds J ARTHUR TRUDEAU MEMORIAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAIL TO PREVAIL ↗
  • Who funds THE FOGARTY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NARRAGANSETT COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Lifespan Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Rhode Island IncRI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 62%
  • Kennedy-Donovan Center Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Latham Centers Inc: 39% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP?

Find your warmest path to Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roy T Morgan Foundation Inc Co Gilstein Kinder & Levin LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph