Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roy P Drachman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$172kRecreation & Sports$89kScience & Tech$45kArts & Culture$35kAnimals$22kYouth Development$20kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$761k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA$10,000
FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION$10,000
STEPEHN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU$5,000
FIRST TEE OF TUCSON$5,000
THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION$2,500
REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,500
ARIZONA DAILY STAR SPORTSMEN'S FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $15k → 15%STEPEHN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU: $5k → 11%THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $14k → 15%THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $14k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $10k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $10k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $10k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $10k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $5k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $5k → 15%TUCSON CONQUISTADORES: $5k → 15%Conquistadores Youth Golf Program: $15k → 15%FIRST TEE OF TUCSON: $5k → 15%FIRST TEE OF TUCSON: $5k → 15%CONQUISTADORES YOUTH GOLF FUND: $5k → 15%FIRST TEE OF TUCSON: $5k → 15%FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $10k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $8k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $7k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $5k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $5k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $5k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $5k → 15%STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $5k → 15%TUCSON ALLIANCE FOR AUTISM: $5k → 15%REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 15%REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 15%REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$366k · 12 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$366k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-11%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Tucson Conquistadores Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +30%
  • AA
    ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +34%
  • FT
    FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CY
    Conquistadores Youth Golf Program
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • VA
    VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Conquistadores Foundation

Continuing to provide funds and leadership to organizations supporting youth and special needs athletes in Southern Arizona.

Religion
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
4
University of Arizona Alumni Association

Cultivate lifelong connections, strengthen commitment to the university and inspire advocacy, engagement and giving.

5
Tucson Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation
6
Tucson Presidio Trust for Historic Preservation

The mission of the presidio san agustin del tucson trust is to promote, preserve and interpret the origins and history of tucson

7
Arizona Site Steward Program Foundation
Education
8
Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona

The Arts Foundation mission is to advance artistic expression, civic participation, and equitable economic growth of our diverse community by supporting, promoting, and advocating for arts and culture in our region.

Arts & Culture
9
The Dons of Arizona
Education
10
Tucson Parks Foundation Endowment

Support tucson parks foundation, which assists city of tucson parks and recreation department.

11
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
12
Tucson Investigative Reporting Center Inc

The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tucson Conquistadores Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hedrick House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICA — $92,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAICASTEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATI — $49,020 · OtherSTEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDATIArizona Daily Star Sportsmens Fund Inc — $19,431 · OtherArizona Daily Star Sportsmens Fund IncTHE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION — $18,000 · OtherTHE CHALLENGE FOUNDATIONConquistadores Youth Golf Program — $15,000 · OtherConquistadores Youth Golf Program+5 more — $18,100 · Other+5 moreARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA AEROSPACE FOU…FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Arts & CultureFOX TUCSON THEATRE FO…Tucson Conquistadores Inc — $55,000 · Community ImprovementTucson Conquist…REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $21,500 · AnimalsConquistadores Youth Golf Fund — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $10,000 · EducationTUCSON ALLIANCE FOR AUTISM — $6,000 · Health
Other$211,551Arts & Culture$75,000Community Improvement$55,000Animals$21,500Youth Development$20,000Education$10,000Health$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTucson Conquistadores Inc — $55,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $21,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetConquistadores Youth Golf Fund — $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetArizona Daily Star Sportsmens Fund Inc — $19,431 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON ALLIANCE FOR AUTISM — $6,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHedrick House Inc — $5,100 over 2y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Inc
  • Who funds ARIZONA AEROSPACE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds Conquistadores Youth Golf Fund
  • Who funds Arizona Daily Star Sportsmens Fund Inc
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds TUCSON ALLIANCE FOR AUTISM
  • Who funds Hedrick House Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roy P Drachman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph