Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roy and Ruth Seibel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$246kEducation$75kEnvironment$39kRecreation & Sports$36kFood & Nutrition$34kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$25,000
DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
BUFFALO TORONTO PUBLIC MEDIA$5,000
MYRIAD USA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BUFFALO OLMSTEAD PARKS CONSERVANCY$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION IN: $25k → 13%JERSEY CITY BALLET: $5k → 14%DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION IN: $20k → 13%JERSEY CITY BALLET: $5k → 14%DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION IN: $19k → 13%JERSEY CITY BALLET: $5k → 14%DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION IN: $11k → 13%JERSEY CITY BALLET: $5k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $5k → 13%JERSEY CITY BALLET: $3k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $5k → 13%KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $4k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $3k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE: $3k → 13%BUFFALO HERITAGE CAROUSEL: $5k → 13%BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $25k → 13%BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 13%BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $4k → 13%BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 13%BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $25k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $25k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $25k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $25k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $25k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $15k → 13%BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $10k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $10k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTEAD PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTEAD PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 13%BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$443k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    University at Buffalo Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +27%
  • BO
    BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +47%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • BH
    BUFFALO HERITAGE CAROUSEL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • KM
    KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ralph Wilson Park Conservancy Inc

The organization was formed for the specific purpose of operating, maintaining and protecting parks and public spaces in the city of buffalo, new york, including but not limited to parks and public spaces owned or operated by the city of…

Recreation & Sports
2
Buffalo Niagara Heritage Village

To instill, educate, and cultivate in a public audience an informed appreciation of the american past and its impact on current lifestyles, culture, and historical development of the town of amherst, including the village of williamsville.…

Arts & Culture
3
The Buffalo City Cemetery Inc

We serve all stakeholders through the preservation and promotion of forest lawn's cemeteries and crematory, offering burial and interment options for past, present and future generations of western new yorkers.

Membership Benefit
4
Buffalo Brownfield Restoration Corporation

Development of downtown

Community Improvement
5
Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences

Inspire joyful exploration of science and nature through engaging experiences, unique resources, and exceptional staff.

Arts & Culture
6
Buffalo Lighthouse Association Inc

Preservation, protection and restoration of the buffalo new york lighthouses and to maintain and develop the area surrounding them in accordance with their historical significance.

—
7
Buffalo Urban Development Corporation

Support the urban economic development efforts of the region through the acquisition, remediation and management of distressed properties

Community Improvement
8
Zoological Society of Buffalo Inc

Building community; creating connections; saving wildlife through a collaboration for change: the buffalo zoo will be a center of conservation excellence, providing leadership to secure a future where wildlife thrives. we embody our…

Animals
9
Buffalo Niagara River Land Trust Inc

To acquire, remediate, and steward lands along wny's waterfronts prioritizing public access.

Environment
10
Better Parks Buffalo Inc

Create new public golf and recreation amenities in the city of buffalo; assist in the restoration of frederick law olmsted's south park arboretum; and construct a new education center for underserved, minority youth.

—
11
Theodore Roosevelt Inaugural Site Foundation

The theodore roosevelt inaugural national historic site to preserve, promote, and educate the public on where theodore roosevelt became the 26th president of the united states in 1901; promotes opportunities for the public to understand…

—
12
Erie Canalway Heritage Fund Inc

Erie canalway heritage fund, inc. works to preserve the extraordinary canal corridor heritage, to promote the corridor as a world class tourism destination, and to foster vibrant communities connected by the waterway.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Damariscotta Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $150,000 · OtherBUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRABUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $39,000 · OtherBUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENSFRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC: $34,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INCIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUFFALO TORONTO PUBLIC MEDIA: $14,500 · OtherBUFFALO TORONTO PUBLIC MEDIAFOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · OtherDAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SO…BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONS…BUFFALO HERITAGE CAROUSEL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $75,000 · EducationUniversity at Buff…MYRIAD USA INC: $5,000 · International
Other$271,500Arts & Culture$106,000Education$75,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $60,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $36,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetBUFFALO HERITAGE CAROUSEL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO HERITAGE CAROUSEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Baird FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Baird Foundation · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roy and Ruth Seibel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roy and Ruth Seibel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roy and Ruth Seibel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph