Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5390

Rotary district 5390 uses it resources to assist the montana rotary clubs build vibrant and prosperous communities in our state and world

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$68kYouth Development$45kInternational$29kEducation$20kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$12kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $46,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,071 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,071 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$6,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rotary Club of Bozeman Sunrise$16,000
Missoula Sunrise Rotary Club$6,000
Rotary Club of Bozeman Noon$6,000
District 5390 Youth Exchange$6,000
Rotary Club of Big Sky$6,000
Rotary Club of Evergreen$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEHALL: $3k → 8%ROTARY CLUB OF TOWNSEND: $2k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF RED LODGE: $3k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF LIVINGSTON: $3k → 10%ROTARY CLUB OF MILES CITY: $3k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF EVERGREEN: $3k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF HAMILTON: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF ANACONDA: $3k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $4k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF BIGFORK: $2k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF TOWNSEND: $1k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF RED LODGE: $2k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF EVERGREEN: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF ANACONDA: $2k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $3k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF BIGFORK: $2k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEFISH: $4k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $2k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEFISH: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBIA FALLS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Rotary International District 5390’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rotary International District 5390lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 14 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$153k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

43%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’25
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $33k · revenue -59%
  • BS
    BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB
    3× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue -64%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue 0% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • GF
    GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -69%
  • RD
    ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Service club

—
2
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
3
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

—
4
River Falls Rotary Club

Community/World Service

—
5
Rotary International Yuma Foothills Rotary

To provide service to others, promote high ethical standards, and to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace.

—
6
Rotary International Walla Walla Sunrise Rotary Club

Public Service. Rotarians are involved in community service and other activities to benefit the community and youth.

—
7
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

—
8
Rotary International Boone Rotary Club

Community service club that provides educational & charitable assistance to boone county, iowa.

—
9
Rotary International

The object of the rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

—
10
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
11
Rotary International - Souderton-Telford

A service org. that contrib. to the community & provides volunteer services.

—
12
Rotary International Ipswich Rotary Club

Promote social welfare

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International Billings Rotary; the most unlike its peers is Libby Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB: $22,440 · OtherBOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUBROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL: $22,396 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELLRotary Club of Bozeman Sunrise: $16,000 · OtherRotary Club of Bozeman SunriseHELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $15,300 · OtherHELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION INCROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY: $13,125 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARYROTARY CLUB OF BUTTE MONTANA USA: $8,610 · OtherLIBBY ROTARY CLUB: $8,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL WHITEFISH ROTARY CLUB: $6,107 · OtherMissoula Sunrise Rotary Club: $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Bozeman Noon: $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Evergreen: $6,000 · OtherDistrict 5390 Youth Exchange: $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Big Sky: $6,000 · Other+11 more: $34,526 · Other+11 moreROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION: $33,449 · PhilanthropyROTARY DISTRICT 5…GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,940 · Youth DevelopmentROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM: $4,000 · EducationTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $524 · International
Other$176,504Philanthropy$33,449Youth Development$5,940Education$4,000International$524

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION: $33,449 over 2y, 20% of budgetBOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB: $22,440 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL: $22,396 over 3y, 59% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY: $13,125 over 3y, 18% of budgetGREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,940 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM: $4,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $524 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY ↗
  • Who funds LIBBY ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL WHITEFISH ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 5390 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 5390. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 5390’s filings →

    More from the funding graph